Re: [Springframework-developer] Road map

[Colin S. <col...@ex...>]

This is fine with me. It seems like JMX and validation are in fairly=20
capable hands, and JMS is on it's way at least, so as OGNL scratches an=20
itch for a lot of people (including me), I think I will be working on it=20
before this timeframe, hopefully for inclusion in 1.1...


j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote:

>Dear Spring developers,
>=20
>I'd like to discuss a refined road map for the next couple of months. My=
 initial suggestions were a bit too eager, I guess, given that we still n=
eed to refine javadocs and reference docs for 1.0.x, and of course apply =
bugfixes respectively appropriate minor enhancements.
>=20
>So I suggest the following time plan now:
>=20
>Spring 1.0.x: doc polishing, bugfixing, minor enhancements
>- 1.0.1: early April
>- 1.0.2: late May
>=20
>Spring 1.1.x: JMS support, JMX support, declarative validation
>- 1.1 RC1: early July
>- 1.1 final: late August
>- 1.1.1: late September
>=20
>Spring 1.2.x: OGNL support, JCA support, enhanced RMI support
>- 1.2 RC1: early November
>- 1.2 final: late December
>=20
>Further issues are JSF and Portlet support. There is actually quite a bi=
t of interest in these from various users/integrators; they are also impo=
rtant for us from a marketing perspective. I'm not keen on providing offi=
cial support before 1.2, though.
>=20
>Regards,
>Juergen
>=20
>