|
From: William G. T. Jr. <wg...@ru...> - 2004-03-31 13:20:35
|
Rod Johnson wrote: > Some comments: > > Spring 1.0.x: doc polishing, bugfixing, minor enhancements > - 1.0.1: early April > - 1.0.2: late May > > Spring 1.1.x: JMS support, JMX support, declarative validation > [RJ: pointcut expression language (AOP), JSR-175 preview? ] > - 1.1 RC1: early July > - 1.1 final: late August > - 1.1.1: late September > [RJ: why are we _scheduling_ a 1.1.1?] > > Spring 1.2.x: OGNL support, JCA support, enhanced RMI support > - 1.2 RC1: early November > - 1.2 final: late December > > Further issues are JSF and Portlet support. There is actually quite a bit of > interest in these from various users/integrators; they are also important > for us from a marketing perspective. I'm not keen on providing official > support before 1.2, though. > > [RJ: depends on what's involved. I'd be keen to have JSF support sooner > rather than later if it's straightforward. I'm going to be looking at that > soon. Portlets I think are more of a niche interest. ] Not sure if we constitute the niche or not, but I tell you that we are very interested in having Spring support for the Portlet API similar to the Spring WebMVC. If things continue to go the way they are around here the portal will be the primary service delivery mechanism...meaning all of our Spring apps will live behind the Portlet API not the Servlet API. Cheers, Bill -- William G. Thompson, Jr. Associate Director of New Technologies Administrative Computing Services, Rutgers University voice: 732 445-5428 | fax: 732 445-5493 | wg...@ru... |