RE: [Springframework-developer] Container Bean threshold?

[Cameron B. <ca...@da...>]

I have run into a similar problem - a very strange one at that.

It is somehow linked to the
org.springframework.aop.framework.autoproxy.BeanNameAutoProxyCreator and =
the
org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionInterceptor and =
the
number of beans in the context.

Though for me, it wasn't anything like 96 !

I have attached a dummy test with supporting dummy hibernate classes and
mapping.

All you should need is the hibernate and spring dependencies to run this
test.

There are 3 test methods.

testDummy which passes

testExtraDummy which fails=20
  - all it does is add an extra dummy service bean to the end of the =
context

testEvenMoreDummiesWithoutAutoProxyCreator which passes
  - it removed the auto proxy creator and adds some more dummies to the =
end

I am not sure what conclusion you can draw from this test.. But it seems
like incorrect behaviour to me.

And - it is stopping one of my applications from working.

Thanks

Cameron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: spr...@li...=20
> [mailto:spr...@li...]
>  On Behalf Of j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT]
> Sent: Saturday, 7 February 2004 3:41 AM
> To: spr...@li...
> Subject: RE: [Springframework-developer] Container Bean threshold?
>=20
> Ross,
>=20
> Any news on this front? I can't find anything that could=20
> cause such behavior. A stacktrace would be helpful, I guess :-)
>=20
> Juergen
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: spr...@li...
> [mailto:spr...@li...]
> On Behalf Of Ross Mason
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 3:44 AM
> To: spr...@li...
> Subject: [Springframework-developer] Container Bean threshold?
>=20
>=20
> Hi guys,
>=20
> I've just found some interesting behaviour in the spring=20
> container.  If we have 96 beans in the container everything=20
> works fine, but if we add one more bean, say bean97, the=20
> container complains that there may be a circular reference=20
> even though I'm sure there isn't. But if we remove a=20
> different (and totally unrelated) bean and add our bean97=20
> bean it works fine.  It seems the container has a bean=20
> threshold of 96?!
>=20
> Basically, we cannot add any than 96 beans to the container.
>=20
> Have you seen this behaviour before?
>=20
> --
> Cheers,
>=20
> Ross
> http://blog.rossmason.com
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere=20
> Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the=20
> breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere=20
> Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the=20
> breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>=20