|
From: <sam...@ma...> - 2004-03-12 10:36:58
|
Quoting Ben Alex <ben...@ac...>: <snip> > > Whilst I initially wrote the above project with a view to inclusion in > Spring, I also recognise there are no Spring-specific dependencies apart > from standard bean context and interceptor services. As such, from a > technical perspective security could be effectively developed in a separate > project, or as a separate module under Spring CVS. There is no technical > requirement in having it in Spring core. The real issue is whether from a > marketing perspective the Spring Framework needs its very own security > capability/project, an "official" separate security project that users are > pointed towards, or a list of external (untested) security projects that > claim to support Spring. > > It would be nice to avoid duplication of efforts on security, particularly > given most of it involves writing adapters between the project security and > the container's native security. Maximising the user and developer base of a > single security project will also have obvious benefits in terms of testing, > issue identification, support and improvement. > > Ben Looking at Spring as a relative newcomer, I can see that in Spring itself there is already support for a wide number of API's and technology, any of which could be in seperate projects. Persoanlly, I prefer being able to download one big bundle then pick and choose what I use. Your project will certainly be of use to people, and having it inside Spring as a fully supported API adds to Spring as a whole - it will also lead people to think it will have a certain level of quality in line with the rest of the Spring code. I have no objections to it being included, but as a non-commiter its not reall my place to say... sam http://www.magpiebrain.com/ |