Re: [Springframework-developer] RE: validation stuff

[Seth L. <se...@eh...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


| I agree completely we should use Errors.  What I would like to do is take
| the best parts of your design and take the parts of mine I feel are strong
| and merge the two in the sandbox for review.  Nothings going to be
| complicated, hopefully simplified.  If something doesn't meet your
| requirements, let me know immediately!  I'll work with you to get our
stuff
| committed ASAP.

I agree, let's get something into sandbox soon.

Here are some requirements:

- - Be allowed to put MessageSourceResolvable into message args of
messages (patch in JIRA to do this)
- - attach validation rules to getters of objects
- - use a singleton validator (of type AttributeValidator, or whatever) to
validate all Command objects.  In other words, remove requirement to
write a Validator for each Command Object.
- - Minimize any configurations.  Since it deals w/ attributes, shouldn't
be an issue.
- - Validate object graphs (recurse through command object)
- - Make it easy to add new rules
- - Javascript generation from rules (we'll worry about that later :)
- - Impact on Spring should be minimal

Hope that helps.  Looking forward to helping!
Seth
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAR4bk5EIB1scRes8RAkhjAKCSZZ/VTks2fgQ6uESOmSwMmvdX5QCeOGVb
H0SyYuiT1LBpEFodafGfPjE=
=1r71
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----