Re: [Springframework-developer] Please add the license to the web site

[<tri...@tr...>]

A couple of questions that I think we should resolve before 1.0 final.

Should we use the Apache License, Version 2.0 instead - any Apache projects
released after March 1st is going to use the 2.0 version.  Also, shouldn't we
have a Contributor License Agreement for each developer if we are going to
assign the copyrights to the Spring Framework Project?

Thomas


Quoting "jürgen höller [werk3AT]" <jue...@we...>:

> Everyone,
> =20
> I've recently adapted the text of our license a bit for 1.0 RC2.
> =20
> It clarifies that it applies to all files contained in the download now, =
> except the third-party libraries in the "lib" directory. I've also added =
> Rod and myself as representatives of the "Spring Framework Project"; =
> I've read somewhere that a copyright should in some way refer to legal =
> entities rather than just a legally undefined "project".
> =20
> If there are any objections or suggestions regarding the wording, please =
> raise your hand!
> =20
> Juergen
> =20
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag =
> von Cameron Braid
> Gesendet: So 29.02.2004 14:04
> An: spr...@li...
> Betreff: [Springframework-developer] Please add the license to the web =
> site
> 
> 
> I know that you are using an apache license, though there is no mention =
> if this readily availible on the web site.
> =20
> Thanks.
> =20
> Cameron
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
> Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
> a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>