|
From: Rod J. <rod...@in...> - 2004-02-23 21:04:21
|
I've emailed Geir. But I'm all in favour of FreeMarker integration anyway. I think it would be very easy. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Darren Davison" <da...@da...> To: <spr...@li...> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 10:52 AM Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] Velocity Tools > In general, I wonder why the Velocity project is moving so slowly. It took > them over half a year to move from 1.3.1 RC1 to 1.3.1 final. Velocity > Tools 1.1 final could easily have been released last autumn: After all, > it's just a couple of straightforward, pretty simple hellper classes. This > definitely doesn't help in terms of Velocity adoption. you're right. In fact it has been remarked upon by less kind people that Velocity is dead. The site says they are working on a 1.5 branch but the CVS repository shows very few changes to any source code in the last year. At the end of the day, it's not a major problem for most users. It's a stable tool that does a specific job fairly well - most of my tests suggest it's still ahead of JSP in performance terms and the majority of graphic designers (IME) prefer it to an xml-based sytax. I think though that they may have lost some mindshare (if not some developers) to FreeMarker. On which note, if no-one else is intending to do it, I'm planning on looking at a FreeMarker integration along similar lines to the Velocity integration for Spring 1.1 Regards, -- Darren Davison Public Key: http://www.davison.uk.net/key.jsp ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=ick _______________________________________________ Springframework-developer mailing list Spr...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |