Re: [Springframework-developer] Spring sub-projects

[Colin S. <col...@ex...>]

+1

jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote:

>Everybody,
> 
>As recently discussed in private mails, I suggest to keep sub-projects that are close to the Spring core as separate modules in Spring's main CVS. The first two candidates are:
> 
>- Keith Donald's Spring Rich Client Platform
>- Torsten Juergeleit's Spring Eclipse Plugin
> 
>Both Keith and Torsten are in favor of hosting them in our main CVS. So if noone objects, I will create new CVS modules "spring-rcp" and "spring-eclipse", and accordingly give Keith and Torsten commit rights for the main CVS. As the module names cannot be changed easily, feel free to suggest different names!
> 
>The rationale is to keep all projects that use "org.springframework" as package name in Spring's main CVS. Separate modules make sense to let the sub-projects evolve independently; this way, they do not have to be released in direct accordance with the Spring core. Of course, generic classes that emerge can still go into the core.
> 
>Consequently, both sub-projects should also get respective sections on our main website. We should definitely clarify all this before 1.0 final (March 1st), as I expect quite a lot of media coverage at that time - we shouldn't miss that chance!
> 
>Juergen
>  
>