|
From: <jue...@we...> - 2004-02-16 09:02:29
|
Everybody, =20 As recently discussed in private mails, I suggest to keep sub-projects = that are close to the Spring core as separate modules in Spring's main = CVS. The first two candidates are: =20 - Keith Donald's Spring Rich Client Platform - Torsten Juergeleit's Spring Eclipse Plugin =20 Both Keith and Torsten are in favor of hosting them in our main CVS. So = if noone objects, I will create new CVS modules "spring-rcp" and = "spring-eclipse", and accordingly give Keith and Torsten commit rights = for the main CVS. As the module names cannot be changed easily, feel = free to suggest different names! =20 The rationale is to keep all projects that use "org.springframework" as = package name in Spring's main CVS. Separate modules make sense to let = the sub-projects evolve independently; this way, they do not have to be = released in direct accordance with the Spring core. Of course, generic = classes that emerge can still go into the core. =20 Consequently, both sub-projects should also get respective sections on = our main website. We should definitely clarify all this before 1.0 final = (March 1st), as I expect quite a lot of media coverage at that time - we = shouldn't miss that chance! =20 Juergen =20 |