Re: [Springframework-developer] DTD versioning

[Rod J. <rod...@in...>]

Colin

I agree about versioning, so long as we can avoid breaking people's
definitions. We could have only the new URL on the web site and modify the
entity resolver so that it produces a log warning on finding the old one
(but still resolved it). This should provide a deprecation-style upgrade
path.

Regards,
Rod

----- Original Message -----
From: "Colin Sampaleanu" <col...@ex...>
To: <spr...@li...>
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 3:26 PM
Subject: [Springframework-developer] DTD versioning


> I updated the DTD on the website, and this reminds me that we should
> version the document. I propose naming it something like
>
> spring-beans_1_0.dtd
>
> with the doctype definition being:
>
> <!DOCTYPE beans PUBLIC "-//SPRING//DTD BEAN 1.0//EN"
>         "http://www.springframework.org/dtd/spring-beans_1_0.dtd">
>
> If everyone is in agreement, the only question is if we should keep the
> old one around (ie keep both versions) for the 1.0 release. I would
> favour having only the new version, to avoid future confusion, although
> this would force everybody to update their definition documents.
>
> Regards,
> Colin
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
> Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
> a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>