Re: [Springframework-developer] Ready for 1.0 RC1

[Colin S. <col...@ex...>]

I think Thomas is saying that classes12 didn't work with JDK 1.3 with=20
8i. It probably works with 9i... Thomas, please correct me if I am wrong.


j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote:

>Thanks for testing, Thomas. It's a pity that this approach just works fo=
r JDK 1.4; however, JDKs are easier to upgrade than databases. I've never=
 tried it on JDK 1.3, but I did try classes12 with JDK 1.4, and that did =
work (after I've changed our code to read the Oracle constants via reflec=
tion; the constant values differ between classes12 and ojdbc14!). I'm not=
 sure why JDK 1.3 causes a problem here.
>=20
>I'm finally gonna release RC1 tonight, so there's still a couple of hour=
s to go if you find any issues :-)
>=20
>Juergen
>=20
>
>________________________________
>
>Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag vo=
n tri...@tr...
>Gesendet: Di 10.02.2004 17:40
>An: spr...@li...
>Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] Ready for 1.0 RC1
>
>
>
>I tried the imagedb sample application for Oracle.  It works using JDK 1=
.4 and
>the odbcj14.jar jdbc driver for an 8i database.  It does not work at all=
 using
>JDK 1.3 and  classes12.zip/jar.  This means that we are limited to JDK 1=
.4 for
>this type functionality with Oracle for now.
>
>Just to clarify the Oracle drivers - there are no particular 8i or 9i jd=
bc
>drivers.  They are just labeled based on which database version they are
>distributed with.  They should be backwards compatible, and if they are =
not it
>is a bug.  (There is even a patch for the driver that came with 8i to fi=
x a
>problem connecting to a 9i database.)  The only driver availale for JDK =
1.4 is
>the ojdbc14.jar that comes with 9i.  Haven't checked out the 10g drivers=
 yet.
>
>I ran into a small problem with the html generated by the application.  =
The
>browser did not pick up the end of the <textarea> for the description.  =
I added
>a separate closing tag and comitted it to cvs.
>
>Thomas
> =20
>