From: Joel de G. <jo...@bo...> - 2003-10-30 11:00:49
|
Peder Holt <bur...@ya...> wrote: > --- Joel de Guzman <jo...@bo...> skrev: >> Hi Y'all, >> >> Ok here's the score... >> >> For the 1.8.0 release, my opinion is to not include >> the VC6 >> tree code. We can add it later. Rationale: even >> numbered >> versions must be stable. I think the VC6 patch is >> not yet stable. >> 1) What used to work on VC7 does not work with the >> patch. > > Hmm. This has probably got something to do with the > BOOST_SPIRIT_DEPENDENT_TEMPLATE_WRAPPER changes > (adding of the ::param_t. > Implementation of > BOOST_SPIRIT_DEPENDENT_TEMPLATE_WRAPPER differs > between VC6 and VC7. > Adding the following in the VC7 version might do the > trick > typedef name##_impl<is_msvc_70_ETI_arg<F>::value>:: > template result_<T> param_t; Yes, I think that's it. I have created a RELEASE_1_8_0 branch and left the HEAD CVS with your patch applied. I would appreciate it a lot if you can make it work with VC7. > I'll try to get hold of the VC7 compiler to check this > out. Great! Thanks! >> 2) The trees used to work on g++ 2.95.3. Now it is >> ICEing with the >> patches. (line 1222, tree/common.hpp). 3) It seems > > Is this compiler available for windows? I haven't got > linux installed. I use MinGW and Cygwin. Take your pick. Both are available for Windows. > I'm online using Jabber (burbelgruff) most of the > time, so just contact me there. That will be nice. Many thanks! Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net |