[Spirit-general] Re: Bound member binder

[Nicola M. <nmu...@co...>]

Joel de Guzman wrote:

> From: "Nicola Musatti" <nmu...@co...>
> 
>>I'm actually doing something similar with my bound_member. bound_member 
>>is directly derived from your member_function_ptr: it only differs in 
>>that it stores the objects on which to call the member function pointer. 
>>I have an actions class that takes as an argument the object that 
>>performs the actions. The actions class wraps the argument's member 
>>functions into bound_members:
> [snip]
> 
> Looks good. The bound_members class might be a good addition to the
> library. Let's see how that will fit in the overall picture.

If you have no objections, I could put together locally a version of 
binders.hpp with bound_member merged in, for others to play with before 
committing it to cvs.

Cheers,
Nicola