From: Doug L. <dg...@dl...> - 2025-04-29 16:50:08
|
I keep forgetting to suggest this, and I know the silence effect has been discussed already a time or two, but... I've often wanted silence to allow for a certain amount of sound prior to the end of a silence period to be kept. silence -l handles the opposite, keeping sound after silence begins; so maybe -L? silence -l -L.5 1 .2 1% -1 .2 1% would keep 0.5 seconds of sound before each non-silent period. This avoids loss of lead-in sounds that, while short, are definitely noticed by the ear - start of air flowing through a trumpet or pipe organ, the consonant before a loud spoken vowel, etc. -- Doug Lee dg...@dl... http://www.dlee.org "You must let me try, for a true soldier does not admit defeat before the battle." --Helen Keller (in a letter to the president of Radcliffe College) |