Re: [SoX-devel] Announcing sox_ng-14.4.3

[Taylor <tay...@pr...>]

> > discussion not relevant to mainline sox to so...@gr...
> Oops. so...@gr...

OK ... https://groups.io/g/sox-ng

> > gives "sox_ng-14.4.3.tar.gz" 1'639'540
> Sorry, is there something wrong with that?

Not at all.

> Thanks, I've quickly updated the issue
> https://codeberg.org/sox_ng/sox_ng/issues/65

Thanks. Much better now. Maybe change

> An MS/DOS port is probably difficult both for its 8.3 filenames and for its memory management differences.

to

> A 16-bit DOS port would be very difficult due to memory management differences.

A 32-bit DOS binary does not suffer from memory management
differences, and runs on 16-bit DOS (such a FreeDOS) via a DOS
extender. Good DOS extenders are ca 8 KiO...40 KiO in size and
can be included in the binary, so a standalone
DOS binary is well possible.