Re: [SoX-devel] LSF in-tree?

[Reuben T. <rr...@sc...>]

On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, robs wrote:

> Even if Erik accepts all of our updates to LSF, it
> seems unlikely that we could be responsive enough
> getting LSF-related changes to SoX users without
> taking LSF in-tree (for the time being).

Seems reasonable to me: it's the size of the deltas that count, not the size 
of the code. Suggestion: it might be good to maintain the patches in-tree 
so it's obvious what we've changed, and patch a vanilla copy of libsndfile 
at build time.

-- 
http://rrt.sc3d.org/
island, n.  a region of land entirely surrounded by advice (Shackleton)