From: Ron L. <ron...@te...> - 2011-10-22 13:01:59
|
On 21/10/2011 23:08, Ulrich Klauer wrote, about the 'pad' effect: > > (NB. If you are using a lossy file format, such as MP3, the audio > data will be decoded, then re-encoded in the process, possibly > leading to a sound degradation.) > Is this always the case for either 'pad' at beginning, or 'pad' at end? I would be happy just to pad either end, if it would avoid any further encoding losses. Taking MP3 as an example, assuming that any re-encoding may introduce distortion - which I can understand - does padding at the end still rely on a file decode and re-encode process? And, does a similar 'file decode and re-encode process' take place if, instead of 'pad', a 'concatenate' or 'sequence' command/effect is employed, eg to prepend or append a short 'silence' file (of equivalent bit and sample rate, as described in the Sox documentation)? Ron |