From: Reuben T. <rr...@sc...> - 2007-04-24 19:24:18
|
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Chris Bagwell wrote: > I've wanted SoX to support plugins so I'm glad to see this in... but I'm > curious how portable ltdl.c is? Is there a set of platforms that SoX > will no longer run on with these changes? Is it possible to support > both ways (static and dynamic plugins)? I should be precise: on platforms without dynamic linking, you have to use "dlpreopening" or GNU DLD (another library that emulates dynamic linking; GNU deprecate it in favour of dlopen (I guess they're not interested in non-GNU OSes), so let's not go there). Hence, at the moment it would need a little build-system work, but it's not a big deal. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org/ | irrevocable, a. expensive; see also lawyer |