From: Reuben T. <rr...@sc...> - 2007-01-31 14:26:15
|
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Chris Bagwell wrote: >> (also with -t sndfile) >> >> > I think the "(also with -t sndfile)" is an improvement. I'll do that. > Alternatively, you could list a table under the sndfile type description > with what is duplicate supported with the -t sndfile type. That would be useful for someone who wanted to answer the question "what sound file formats can I use with libsndfile", but I don't think that's a really interesting question: normally you shouldn't care. The question I was trying to answer was "I have a weird file that won't load; might I be able to try it with libsndfile?". > I probably prefer the later but not really strong opinions on it. I think > in this approach you could list additional features libsndfile provides > for a given format and not worry about cluttering up individual > descriptions as much. As to what extra features libsndfile provides, even making that list would take a long time, and since I'm moving towards integrating the two sets of I/O code (I have .wve reading working in libsndfile, based on code Erik had already written, so not much progress yet!) I think it would be a waste of time. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org/ | The only person worth beating is yourself |