From: Chris B. <ch...@cn...> - 2007-01-31 14:22:48
|
Reuben Thomas wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, a quegg wrote: > > >> Can we lose this from the man page (at least)? It >> doesn't seem to offer the users anything other than >> confusion. (The non duplicated formats of course are okay). >> > > I think the problem is that it suggests that you *have* to use "-t sndfile" > to get it to work (is that what you mean?). I still want to offer advanced > users an accurate list of formats they can choose to use libsndfile for. > > Can you think of a better notation? I could for example change > > (-t sndfile) > > to > > (also with -t sndfile) > > I think the "(also with -t sndfile)" is an improvement. Alternatively, you could list a table under the sndfile type description with what is duplicate supported with the -t sndfile type. I probably prefer the later but not really strong opinions on it. I think in this approach you could list additional features libsndfile provides for a given format and not worry about cluttering up individual descriptions as much. Chris |