Re: [SO-devel] RFLP Position

[<SLe...@ao...>]

In a message dated 9/6/2003 9:02:09 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
ma...@ge... writes:

> I agree with Richard's reason why restriction_fragment_length_polymorphism
> is a child of uncharacterised_change_in_nucleotide_sequence.
> 
> Michael
> 


It may or may not be uncharacterized. If you characterize it its still an 
RFLP. Can't the generic category "change_in_nucleotide_sequence" be the ISA 
parent of the various possible specific changes, and of RFLP?

Cheers, -Stan