Menu
▾
▴
soleseek-developer — People developing the client.
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(24) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(146) |
Feb
(107) |
Mar
(100) |
Apr
(49) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(42) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Arthur E. <ar...@mo...> - 2004-08-11 16:40:44
|
Hi, long time since a post on this list, but to let you know, if you don't already; someone took SoleSeek's source here and created the closed source SolarSeek. Head over to <http://www.fejta.com/solarseek/> for the latest dev. version and discussion at: <http://slskboard.savagenews.com/index.php? showtopic=19704&view=getnewpost> Arthur |
|
From: Michael S. <ali...@ma...> - 2003-11-25 22:50:39
|
My guess is that they not only haven't gotten any further but have LOST some code and have to rewrite it. Just kiding of course... don't bother finishing it, the quality of the soulseek network has VASTLY diminished and I don't think it even deserves a mac client anymore... What with Direct Connect/eDonkey/Kazaa/Gnutella having native OS X clients and all. mlnet even has a working soulseek plugin that is OS X native. Sincerely Michael Schmid On Nov 25, 2003, at 3:27 PM, Markus Magnuson wrote: > ...on the SoleSeek front? > > -- > Markus Magnuson > ma...@sa... > > "but i better be quiet now > i'm tired of wasting my breath > carrying on and getting upset" > - Elliott Smith (1969 - 2003) > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > SoleSeek-Developer mailing list > Sol...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer |
|
From: Markus M. <ma...@sa...> - 2003-11-25 20:27:40
|
...on the SoleSeek front? -- Markus Magnuson ma...@sa... "but i better be quiet now i'm tired of wasting my breath carrying on and getting upset" - Elliott Smith (1969 - 2003) |
|
From: Jobst S. <mu...@ho...> - 2003-11-12 10:23:09
|
any mac with either G3 or G4 processor can run Panther just fine... Thanks to all the programmers for porting soulseek to OSX! Greetings, Jobst >From: Michael Schmid <ali...@ma...> >Reply-To: sol...@li... >To: sol...@li... >Subject: Re: [soleseek-dev] soleseek could rule? >Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 15:53:15 -0500 > >A used mac that runs 10.3? Good luck! Really! Good luck man!! >Sincerely Michael Schmid >On Nov 8, 2003, at 1:50 PM, Alex Kanavin wrote: > >>On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Iwan Negro wrote: >> >>>can you give me some things i could do besides programming (logo, >>>website, localization etc?)? >> >>One thing you and your friends could do is giving me a mac; a used one >>will do just fine :) >> >>-- >>Alexander >> >>Homepage: http://www.sensi.org/~ak/ >> >> >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, >>16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest >>developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, >>WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ >>_______________________________________________ >>SoleSeek-Developer mailing list >>Sol...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, >16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest >developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, >WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ >_______________________________________________ >SoleSeek-Developer mailing list >Sol...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer _________________________________________________________________ Compare high-speed Internet plans, starting at $26.95. https://broadband.msn.com (Prices may vary by service area.) |
|
From: Michael S. <ali...@ma...> - 2003-11-08 20:53:24
|
A used mac that runs 10.3? Good luck! Really! Good luck man!! Sincerely Michael Schmid On Nov 8, 2003, at 1:50 PM, Alex Kanavin wrote: > On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Iwan Negro wrote: > >> can you give me some things i could do besides programming (logo, >> website, localization etc?)? > > One thing you and your friends could do is giving me a mac; a used one > will do just fine :) > > -- > Alexander > > Homepage: http://www.sensi.org/~ak/ > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, > 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest > developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, > WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ > _______________________________________________ > SoleSeek-Developer mailing list > Sol...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer |
|
From: Alex K. <ak...@se...> - 2003-11-08 18:54:57
|
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Iwan Negro wrote: > can you give me some things i could do besides programming (logo, > website, localization etc?)? One thing you and your friends could do is giving me a mac; a used one will do just fine :) -- Alexander Homepage: http://www.sensi.org/~ak/ |
|
From: Iwan N. <ne...@de...> - 2003-11-08 09:54:33
|
hello i'm not a programmer or some kind of but i love soulseek and i followed your mailinglist for a long time. i'm happy to see that there are still people developing soleseek because the alternatives aren't real alternatives. maybe you don't know how many people are waiting for this cocoa app but i can tell you that there are a lot! and there will be even more if it was released. so it is important to make a good first release to debug it. this leads me to the main question: is there any indication when i could see a first beta release of soleseek? i would really like to help on this project so that it moves faster. can you give me some things i could do besides programming (logo, website, localization etc?)? a lot of my friends are looking at you with impatience for a soleseek release. wouldn't development be fasten up if you would look at other soulseek implementations like: http://sourceforge.net/projects/soulseekx/ http://www.sensi.org/~ak/pyslsk/ http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/mldonkey/ but i'm sure you also refer to them but i'm just so anxious to see a native aqua soulseek that i hope it could be here tomorrow. well... i hope you are motivated to bring us this app and please go on with the good work! greets |
|
From: Matt P. <mp...@op...> - 2003-10-29 07:53:13
|
Not sure what was going on the other day but peer connections are working fine again today. Or as well as they ever did. The last couple of days I've been working on the MP3 bit rate and length code as well as a couple of other things I could work on without being connected. Now that everything's working fine for me again I'll focus on getting the peer browsing code finished. Glad to hear you're working on the search code. To me it seems like it's the biggest problem with the app from a usability point of view. On my 400mhz iMac, my CPU is at 100% whenever it's handling searches which makes scrolling through the results really slow. Matt |
|
From: Robert S. <mi...@fr...> - 2003-10-29 05:15:27
|
On 10/25/03 10:38 PM, "Matt Prowse" <mp...@op...> wrote: > > I've submitted a patch adding context menus to the search view and the > transfer fields. Unforunately there's no file browsing and no user info > or anything fancy. I'm able to connect to the server again and stay > connected, however peer connections seem to be completely broken for > me, which obviously breaks searches and transfers, making the app quite > useless in its present state. It also means I couldn't test the context > menu patch 100% before submitting it. I checked it as best I could > though and it SHOULD work. Patch applied with a few tiny changes. > I was unable to connect to the main server or Isle last night even > using the Windows clients, though the server status thing on the > Soulseek forums page said the server was up so most likely it was a > problem at my end. However as I previously mentioned, peer connections > are broken for me, every one seems to die with either "Error domain 1, > code 61 (Connection refused)", "Error domain -1, code -2 (timeout)" or > " Error domain 1, code 60 (Operation timed out)". I'm having a look at > it now but I think it's probably beyond my abilities to fix. > > Matt I'm in the middle of working on the search code, as results were previously limited to 1000 items. This is putting a lot stress on the existing code (good thing). Some of those error codes are a good thing, we're just letting the connections die as we should. I'll try to configure the verbosity of that reporting in the debug menu. |
|
From: Matt P. <mp...@op...> - 2003-10-26 02:42:12
|
> Surely the contextual menus work? Let's try and break the patches up by > function (unless that is too much work). I'll upgrade to Panther today > and > see if I have problems. I'm pretty sure there are messages when from > the > server connection that we should be doing something more about. I've > never > figured out what we are supposed to do to keep the server connection > alive. I've submitted a patch adding context menus to the search view and the transfer fields. Unforunately there's no file browsing and no user info or anything fancy. I'm able to connect to the server again and stay connected, however peer connections seem to be completely broken for me, which obviously breaks searches and transfers, making the app quite useless in its present state. It also means I couldn't test the context menu patch 100% before submitting it. I checked it as best I could though and it SHOULD work. > I was able to connect just now. Tomorrow, I think I'll add a > preference for > which server to connect to, so you can try Isle if you're having > problems > with the main server. I was unable to connect to the main server or Isle last night even using the Windows clients, though the server status thing on the Soulseek forums page said the server was up so most likely it was a problem at my end. However as I previously mentioned, peer connections are broken for me, every one seems to die with either "Error domain 1, code 61 (Connection refused)", "Error domain -1, code -2 (timeout)" or " Error domain 1, code 60 (Operation timed out)". I'm having a look at it now but I think it's probably beyond my abilities to fix. Matt |
|
From: Michael S. <ali...@ma...> - 2003-10-25 20:11:03
|
no need to send everything twice dude! :P On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 06:41 PM, Paul Edwards wrote: > I was referring to Markus Magnuson's email about checking in all the=20= > updates > we've been waiting for. I've run it too, the project is definately=20 > not a > hoax. It runs well, it is just missing some key features. > > Markus, if you are really going to check this stuff in let us know so=20= > that > no one else decides to roll up their sleeves and implement such things=20= > as > browsing a user's files. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Schmid" <ali...@ma...> > To: <sol...@li...> > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2:58 PM > Subject: Re: [soleseek-dev] Status Update > > > Well I can honestly answer no. It wasn't a hoax. I've run the program > before. just that it doesn't actually work and i don't believe any one > is still working on it actively. You CAN pretty much consider it dead. > At least that way if it DOES ever get ANYWHERE you'll be pleasantly > surprised, and if it doesn't, you won't care. It's hard to expect much > from open source. > On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 04:24 PM, Paul Edwards wrote: > >> Really, was this a hoax? >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Markus Magnuson" <ma...@sa...> >> To: <sol...@li...> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:29 AM >> Subject: Re: [soleseek-dev] Status Update >> >> >> l=F6rdagen den 11 oktober 2003 kl 09.32 skrev = mp...@op...: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> As everyone's probably aware, SourceForge >>> have been working on their CVS servers >>> recently. The result has been that I've been >>> unable to checkout Robert's most recent >>> additions to the code, the most important >>> of which was the transition to AsyncSocket >>> from NetSocket. While waiting for CVS to >>> resume normal operation I've been working >>> on GUI and usability stuff. I've added >>> context menus where appropriate, added >>> provision for cancelling transfers in >>> progress, allowed the transfer list to be >>> cleared of finished and errored transfers, >>> allowed multiple selections in the search and >>> transfer fields (so you can download an >>> entire album or kill off all transfers for a >>> particular user at once for example). More >>> substantially, I've nearly completed the code >>> required to allow browsing of peers' files, >>> and the code required to get the bitrate and >>> length of every file locally shared. Once CVS >>> is running again I'll merge my changes with >>> the current source and submit a patch. >>> >>> I'm posting this to the list cause I said >>> nearly a month ago that I'd started working >>> on SoleSeek again and have said nothing >>> much since. The work I've done on the peer >>> browsing code has familiarised me >>> somewhat with the network code so I >>> should now be able to contribute more >>> towards the really essential work that needs >>> to be done on the project. Hopefully CVS >>> will be back up soon so we can work >>> towards a release before the end of the >>> year. >>> >>> Matt >>> >>> P.S. I'll be upgrading to 10.3 when it comes >>> out on the 24th, anyone know how this >>> likely to affect my ability to code for >>> SoleSeek? If it comes to it I can always >>> keep a copy of 10.2 installed on a separate >>> partition and use it for SoleSeek work. >> >> The CVS is back to normal now, so when will we be seeing all of these >> goodie pieces of code commited? :) >> >> --=20 >> Markus Magnuson >> ma...@sa... >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. >> SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. >> See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: >> Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php >> _______________________________________________ >> SoleSeek-Developer mailing list >> Sol...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. >> Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open >> Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new >> features and functionality. Click here: = http://sourceforge.net/donate/ >> _______________________________________________ >> SoleSeek-Developer mailing list >> Sol...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. > Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open > Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new > features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > SoleSeek-Developer mailing list > Sol...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. > Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open > Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new > features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > SoleSeek-Developer mailing list > Sol...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer |
|
From: Robert S. <mi...@fr...> - 2003-10-25 14:29:00
|
On 10/25/03 8:49 AM, "Matt Prowse" <mp...@op...> wrote: > Just another update as regards my progress. I've been away for the last > week and a bit, hence not at lot of work has been done on SoleSeek > since I last posted here. I had planned to get a patch adding the > context menus and peer file browsing submitted today, but after I > updated to 10.3 SoleSeek seems unable to stay connected to the server > for more than about 2 minutes which has, needless to say, made it > impossible for me to finish the code. > Surely the contextual menus work? Let's try and break the patches up by function (unless that is too much work). I'll upgrade to Panther today and see if I have problems. I'm pretty sure there are messages when from the server connection that we should be doing something more about. I've never figured out what we are supposed to do to keep the server connection alive. > On top of that, I'm now unable to connect to the server at all (even > using the Windows client) so I can't even attempt to track down the > source of the problem. Hopefully the connection problems I was > experiencing were server problems, but I won't know until I'm able to > connect again. > I was able to connect just now. Tomorrow, I think I'll add a preference for which server to connect to, so you can try Isle if you're having problems with the main server. > When the server's accessible again I'll be able to try fixing the > connection problems I was having. If I can sort them out, then you can > expect to see the patches soon after that. If not, well I guess I'll > have to focus on things that I can test offline, of which there are > plenty. > > Matt > |
|
From: Matt P. <mp...@op...> - 2003-10-25 12:53:56
|
Just another update as regards my progress. I've been away for the last week and a bit, hence not at lot of work has been done on SoleSeek since I last posted here. I had planned to get a patch adding the context menus and peer file browsing submitted today, but after I updated to 10.3 SoleSeek seems unable to stay connected to the server for more than about 2 minutes which has, needless to say, made it impossible for me to finish the code. On top of that, I'm now unable to connect to the server at all (even using the Windows client) so I can't even attempt to track down the source of the problem. Hopefully the connection problems I was experiencing were server problems, but I won't know until I'm able to connect again. When the server's accessible again I'll be able to try fixing the connection problems I was having. If I can sort them out, then you can expect to see the patches soon after that. If not, well I guess I'll have to focus on things that I can test offline, of which there are plenty. Matt |
|
From: Markus M. <ma...@sa...> - 2003-10-24 08:15:30
|
fredagen den 24 oktober 2003 kl 00.41 skrev Paul Edwards: > Markus, if you are really going to check this stuff in let us know so > that > no one else decides to roll up their sleeves and implement such things > as > browsing a user's files. It wasn't my code, it was Matt's. I emailed him a week ago asking about this, but I haven't received any reply. I'm looking forward to these changes in the code. -- Markus Magnuson ma...@sa... |
|
From: Michael S. <ali...@ma...> - 2003-10-24 04:38:22
|
Bah, it's just good to see this list semi-active! If only these were=20 soleseek related emails! I also apologize if anything I said came out=20 as ill-manered. On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 09:23 PM, Robert Sayre wrote: > That email was actually from Matt Prowse, who has contributed quite a=20= > lot of > code to SoleSeek, so I'm sure it will show up eventually. No need for > ill-mannered emails. > > On 10/23/03 6:41 PM, "Paul Edwards" <pa...@pa...> wrote: > >> I was referring to Markus Magnuson's email about checking in all the=20= >> updates >> we've been waiting for. I've run it too, the project is definately=20= >> not a >> hoax. It runs well, it is just missing some key features. >> >> Markus, if you are really going to check this stuff in let us know so=20= >> that >> no one else decides to roll up their sleeves and implement such=20 >> things as >> browsing a user's files. >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Michael Schmid" <ali...@ma...> >> To: <sol...@li...> >> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2:58 PM >> Subject: Re: [soleseek-dev] Status Update >> >> >> Well I can honestly answer no. It wasn't a hoax. I've run the program >> before. just that it doesn't actually work and i don't believe any = one >> is still working on it actively. You CAN pretty much consider it = dead. >> At least that way if it DOES ever get ANYWHERE you'll be pleasantly >> surprised, and if it doesn't, you won't care. It's hard to expect = much >> from open source. >> On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 04:24 PM, Paul Edwards wrote: >> >>> Really, was this a hoax? >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Markus Magnuson" <ma...@sa...> >>> To: <sol...@li...> >>> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:29 AM >>> Subject: Re: [soleseek-dev] Status Update >>> >>> >>> l=F6rdagen den 11 oktober 2003 kl 09.32 skrev = mp...@op...: >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> As everyone's probably aware, SourceForge >>>> have been working on their CVS servers >>>> recently. The result has been that I've been >>>> unable to checkout Robert's most recent >>>> additions to the code, the most important >>>> of which was the transition to AsyncSocket >>>> from NetSocket. While waiting for CVS to >>>> resume normal operation I've been working >>>> on GUI and usability stuff. I've added >>>> context menus where appropriate, added >>>> provision for cancelling transfers in >>>> progress, allowed the transfer list to be >>>> cleared of finished and errored transfers, >>>> allowed multiple selections in the search and >>>> transfer fields (so you can download an >>>> entire album or kill off all transfers for a >>>> particular user at once for example). More >>>> substantially, I've nearly completed the code >>>> required to allow browsing of peers' files, >>>> and the code required to get the bitrate and >>>> length of every file locally shared. Once CVS >>>> is running again I'll merge my changes with >>>> the current source and submit a patch. >>>> >>>> I'm posting this to the list cause I said >>>> nearly a month ago that I'd started working >>>> on SoleSeek again and have said nothing >>>> much since. The work I've done on the peer >>>> browsing code has familiarised me >>>> somewhat with the network code so I >>>> should now be able to contribute more >>>> towards the really essential work that needs >>>> to be done on the project. Hopefully CVS >>>> will be back up soon so we can work >>>> towards a release before the end of the >>>> year. >>>> >>>> Matt >>>> >>>> P.S. I'll be upgrading to 10.3 when it comes >>>> out on the 24th, anyone know how this >>>> likely to affect my ability to code for >>>> SoleSeek? If it comes to it I can always >>>> keep a copy of 10.2 installed on a separate >>>> partition and use it for SoleSeek work. >>> >>> The CVS is back to normal now, so when will we be seeing all of = these >>> goodie pieces of code commited? :) >>> >>> --=20 >>> Markus Magnuson >>> ma...@sa... >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. >>> SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. >>> See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: >>> Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SoleSeek-Developer mailing list >>> Sol...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. >>> Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open >>> Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new >>> features and functionality. Click here:=20 >>> http://sourceforge.net/donate/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SoleSeek-Developer mailing list >>> Sol...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. >> Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open >> Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new >> features and functionality. Click here: = http://sourceforge.net/donate/ >> _______________________________________________ >> SoleSeek-Developer mailing list >> Sol...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. >> Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open >> Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new >> features and functionality. Click here: = http://sourceforge.net/donate/ >> _______________________________________________ >> SoleSeek-Developer mailing list >> Sol...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. > Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open > Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new > features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > SoleSeek-Developer mailing list > Sol...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer |
|
From: Paul E. <pa...@pa...> - 2003-10-24 02:05:21
|
Gotcha. Sorry it came off as being rude. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Sayre" <mi...@fr...> To: <sol...@li...> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 6:23 PM Subject: Re: [soleseek-dev] Status Update That email was actually from Matt Prowse, who has contributed quite a lot of code to SoleSeek, so I'm sure it will show up eventually. No need for ill-mannered emails. On 10/23/03 6:41 PM, "Paul Edwards" <pa...@pa...> wrote: > I was referring to Markus Magnuson's email about checking in all the updates > we've been waiting for. I've run it too, the project is definately not a > hoax. It runs well, it is just missing some key features. > > Markus, if you are really going to check this stuff in let us know so that > no one else decides to roll up their sleeves and implement such things as > browsing a user's files. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Schmid" <ali...@ma...> > To: <sol...@li...> > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2:58 PM > Subject: Re: [soleseek-dev] Status Update > > > Well I can honestly answer no. It wasn't a hoax. I've run the program > before. just that it doesn't actually work and i don't believe any one > is still working on it actively. You CAN pretty much consider it dead. > At least that way if it DOES ever get ANYWHERE you'll be pleasantly > surprised, and if it doesn't, you won't care. It's hard to expect much > from open source. > On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 04:24 PM, Paul Edwards wrote: > >> Really, was this a hoax? >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Markus Magnuson" <ma...@sa...> >> To: <sol...@li...> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:29 AM >> Subject: Re: [soleseek-dev] Status Update >> >> >> lördagen den 11 oktober 2003 kl 09.32 skrev mp...@op...: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> As everyone's probably aware, SourceForge >>> have been working on their CVS servers >>> recently. The result has been that I've been >>> unable to checkout Robert's most recent >>> additions to the code, the most important >>> of which was the transition to AsyncSocket >>> from NetSocket. While waiting for CVS to >>> resume normal operation I've been working >>> on GUI and usability stuff. I've added >>> context menus where appropriate, added >>> provision for cancelling transfers in >>> progress, allowed the transfer list to be >>> cleared of finished and errored transfers, >>> allowed multiple selections in the search and >>> transfer fields (so you can download an >>> entire album or kill off all transfers for a >>> particular user at once for example). More >>> substantially, I've nearly completed the code >>> required to allow browsing of peers' files, >>> and the code required to get the bitrate and >>> length of every file locally shared. Once CVS >>> is running again I'll merge my changes with >>> the current source and submit a patch. >>> >>> I'm posting this to the list cause I said >>> nearly a month ago that I'd started working >>> on SoleSeek again and have said nothing >>> much since. The work I've done on the peer >>> browsing code has familiarised me >>> somewhat with the network code so I >>> should now be able to contribute more >>> towards the really essential work that needs >>> to be done on the project. Hopefully CVS >>> will be back up soon so we can work >>> towards a release before the end of the >>> year. >>> >>> Matt >>> >>> P.S. I'll be upgrading to 10.3 when it comes >>> out on the 24th, anyone know how this >>> likely to affect my ability to code for >>> SoleSeek? If it comes to it I can always >>> keep a copy of 10.2 installed on a separate >>> partition and use it for SoleSeek work. >> >> The CVS is back to normal now, so when will we be seeing all of these >> goodie pieces of code commited? :) >> >> -- >> Markus Magnuson >> ma...@sa... >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. >> SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. >> See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: >> Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php >> _______________________________________________ >> SoleSeek-Developer mailing list >> Sol...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. >> Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open >> Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new >> features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ >> _______________________________________________ >> SoleSeek-Developer mailing list >> Sol...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. > Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open > Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new > features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > SoleSeek-Developer mailing list > Sol...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. > Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open > Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new > features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > SoleSeek-Developer mailing list > Sol...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ SoleSeek-Developer mailing list Sol...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer |
|
From: Robert S. <mi...@fr...> - 2003-10-24 01:26:35
|
That email was actually from Matt Prowse, who has contributed quite a lot o= f code to SoleSeek, so I'm sure it will show up eventually. No need for ill-mannered emails. On 10/23/03 6:41 PM, "Paul Edwards" <pa...@pa...> wrote: > I was referring to Markus Magnuson's email about checking in all the upda= tes > we've been waiting for. I've run it too, the project is definately not a > hoax. It runs well, it is just missing some key features. >=20 > Markus, if you are really going to check this stuff in let us know so tha= t > no one else decides to roll up their sleeves and implement such things as > browsing a user's files. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Schmid" <ali...@ma...> > To: <sol...@li...> > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2:58 PM > Subject: Re: [soleseek-dev] Status Update >=20 >=20 > Well I can honestly answer no. It wasn't a hoax. I've run the program > before. just that it doesn't actually work and i don't believe any one > is still working on it actively. You CAN pretty much consider it dead. > At least that way if it DOES ever get ANYWHERE you'll be pleasantly > surprised, and if it doesn't, you won't care. It's hard to expect much > from open source. > On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 04:24 PM, Paul Edwards wrote: >=20 >> Really, was this a hoax? >>=20 >>=20 >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Markus Magnuson" <ma...@sa...> >> To: <sol...@li...> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:29 AM >> Subject: Re: [soleseek-dev] Status Update >>=20 >>=20 >> l=F6rdagen den 11 oktober 2003 kl 09.32 skrev mp...@op...: >>=20 >>> Hi All, >>>=20 >>> As everyone's probably aware, SourceForge >>> have been working on their CVS servers >>> recently. The result has been that I've been >>> unable to checkout Robert's most recent >>> additions to the code, the most important >>> of which was the transition to AsyncSocket >>> from NetSocket. While waiting for CVS to >>> resume normal operation I've been working >>> on GUI and usability stuff. I've added >>> context menus where appropriate, added >>> provision for cancelling transfers in >>> progress, allowed the transfer list to be >>> cleared of finished and errored transfers, >>> allowed multiple selections in the search and >>> transfer fields (so you can download an >>> entire album or kill off all transfers for a >>> particular user at once for example). More >>> substantially, I've nearly completed the code >>> required to allow browsing of peers' files, >>> and the code required to get the bitrate and >>> length of every file locally shared. Once CVS >>> is running again I'll merge my changes with >>> the current source and submit a patch. >>>=20 >>> I'm posting this to the list cause I said >>> nearly a month ago that I'd started working >>> on SoleSeek again and have said nothing >>> much since. The work I've done on the peer >>> browsing code has familiarised me >>> somewhat with the network code so I >>> should now be able to contribute more >>> towards the really essential work that needs >>> to be done on the project. Hopefully CVS >>> will be back up soon so we can work >>> towards a release before the end of the >>> year. >>>=20 >>> Matt >>>=20 >>> P.S. I'll be upgrading to 10.3 when it comes >>> out on the 24th, anyone know how this >>> likely to affect my ability to code for >>> SoleSeek? If it comes to it I can always >>> keep a copy of 10.2 installed on a separate >>> partition and use it for SoleSeek work. >>=20 >> The CVS is back to normal now, so when will we be seeing all of these >> goodie pieces of code commited? :) >>=20 >> --=20 >> Markus Magnuson >> ma...@sa... >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. >> SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. >> See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: >> Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php >> _______________________________________________ >> SoleSeek-Developer mailing list >> Sol...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. >> Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open >> Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new >> features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ >> _______________________________________________ >> SoleSeek-Developer mailing list >> Sol...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. > Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open > Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new > features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > SoleSeek-Developer mailing list > Sol...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. > Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open > Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new > features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > SoleSeek-Developer mailing list > Sol...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer >=20 >=20 |
|
From: Paul E. <pa...@pa...> - 2003-10-24 00:48:37
|
I was referring to Markus Magnuson's email about checking in all the updates we've been waiting for. I've run it too, the project is definately not a hoax. It runs well, it is just missing some key features. Markus, if you are really going to check this stuff in let us know so that no one else decides to roll up their sleeves and implement such things as browsing a user's files. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Schmid" <ali...@ma...> To: <sol...@li...> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2:58 PM Subject: Re: [soleseek-dev] Status Update Well I can honestly answer no. It wasn't a hoax. I've run the program before. just that it doesn't actually work and i don't believe any one is still working on it actively. You CAN pretty much consider it dead. At least that way if it DOES ever get ANYWHERE you'll be pleasantly surprised, and if it doesn't, you won't care. It's hard to expect much from open source. On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 04:24 PM, Paul Edwards wrote: > Really, was this a hoax? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Markus Magnuson" <ma...@sa...> > To: <sol...@li...> > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:29 AM > Subject: Re: [soleseek-dev] Status Update > > > lördagen den 11 oktober 2003 kl 09.32 skrev mp...@op...: > >> Hi All, >> >> As everyone's probably aware, SourceForge >> have been working on their CVS servers >> recently. The result has been that I've been >> unable to checkout Robert's most recent >> additions to the code, the most important >> of which was the transition to AsyncSocket >> from NetSocket. While waiting for CVS to >> resume normal operation I've been working >> on GUI and usability stuff. I've added >> context menus where appropriate, added >> provision for cancelling transfers in >> progress, allowed the transfer list to be >> cleared of finished and errored transfers, >> allowed multiple selections in the search and >> transfer fields (so you can download an >> entire album or kill off all transfers for a >> particular user at once for example). More >> substantially, I've nearly completed the code >> required to allow browsing of peers' files, >> and the code required to get the bitrate and >> length of every file locally shared. Once CVS >> is running again I'll merge my changes with >> the current source and submit a patch. >> >> I'm posting this to the list cause I said >> nearly a month ago that I'd started working >> on SoleSeek again and have said nothing >> much since. The work I've done on the peer >> browsing code has familiarised me >> somewhat with the network code so I >> should now be able to contribute more >> towards the really essential work that needs >> to be done on the project. Hopefully CVS >> will be back up soon so we can work >> towards a release before the end of the >> year. >> >> Matt >> >> P.S. I'll be upgrading to 10.3 when it comes >> out on the 24th, anyone know how this >> likely to affect my ability to code for >> SoleSeek? If it comes to it I can always >> keep a copy of 10.2 installed on a separate >> partition and use it for SoleSeek work. > > The CVS is back to normal now, so when will we be seeing all of these > goodie pieces of code commited? :) > > -- > Markus Magnuson > ma...@sa... > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > _______________________________________________ > SoleSeek-Developer mailing list > Sol...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. > Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open > Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new > features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > SoleSeek-Developer mailing list > Sol...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ SoleSeek-Developer mailing list Sol...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer |
|
From: Michael S. <ali...@ma...> - 2003-10-23 22:02:10
|
Well I can honestly answer no. It wasn't a hoax. I've run the program=20 before. just that it doesn't actually work and i don't believe any one=20= is still working on it actively. You CAN pretty much consider it dead.=20= At least that way if it DOES ever get ANYWHERE you'll be pleasantly=20 surprised, and if it doesn't, you won't care. It's hard to expect much=20= from open source. On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 04:24 PM, Paul Edwards wrote: > Really, was this a hoax? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Markus Magnuson" <ma...@sa...> > To: <sol...@li...> > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:29 AM > Subject: Re: [soleseek-dev] Status Update > > > l=F6rdagen den 11 oktober 2003 kl 09.32 skrev mp...@op...: > >> Hi All, >> >> As everyone's probably aware, SourceForge >> have been working on their CVS servers >> recently. The result has been that I've been >> unable to checkout Robert's most recent >> additions to the code, the most important >> of which was the transition to AsyncSocket >> from NetSocket. While waiting for CVS to >> resume normal operation I've been working >> on GUI and usability stuff. I've added >> context menus where appropriate, added >> provision for cancelling transfers in >> progress, allowed the transfer list to be >> cleared of finished and errored transfers, >> allowed multiple selections in the search and >> transfer fields (so you can download an >> entire album or kill off all transfers for a >> particular user at once for example). More >> substantially, I've nearly completed the code >> required to allow browsing of peers' files, >> and the code required to get the bitrate and >> length of every file locally shared. Once CVS >> is running again I'll merge my changes with >> the current source and submit a patch. >> >> I'm posting this to the list cause I said >> nearly a month ago that I'd started working >> on SoleSeek again and have said nothing >> much since. The work I've done on the peer >> browsing code has familiarised me >> somewhat with the network code so I >> should now be able to contribute more >> towards the really essential work that needs >> to be done on the project. Hopefully CVS >> will be back up soon so we can work >> towards a release before the end of the >> year. >> >> Matt >> >> P.S. I'll be upgrading to 10.3 when it comes >> out on the 24th, anyone know how this >> likely to affect my ability to code for >> SoleSeek? If it comes to it I can always >> keep a copy of 10.2 installed on a separate >> partition and use it for SoleSeek work. > > The CVS is back to normal now, so when will we be seeing all of these > goodie pieces of code commited? :) > > --=20 > Markus Magnuson > ma...@sa... > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > _______________________________________________ > SoleSeek-Developer mailing list > Sol...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. > Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open > Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new > features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > SoleSeek-Developer mailing list > Sol...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer |
|
From: Paul E. <pa...@pa...> - 2003-10-23 20:58:53
|
Really, was this a hoax? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Markus Magnuson" <ma...@sa...> To: <sol...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:29 AM Subject: Re: [soleseek-dev] Status Update lördagen den 11 oktober 2003 kl 09.32 skrev mp...@op...: > Hi All, > > As everyone's probably aware, SourceForge > have been working on their CVS servers > recently. The result has been that I've been > unable to checkout Robert's most recent > additions to the code, the most important > of which was the transition to AsyncSocket > from NetSocket. While waiting for CVS to > resume normal operation I've been working > on GUI and usability stuff. I've added > context menus where appropriate, added > provision for cancelling transfers in > progress, allowed the transfer list to be > cleared of finished and errored transfers, > allowed multiple selections in the search and > transfer fields (so you can download an > entire album or kill off all transfers for a > particular user at once for example). More > substantially, I've nearly completed the code > required to allow browsing of peers' files, > and the code required to get the bitrate and > length of every file locally shared. Once CVS > is running again I'll merge my changes with > the current source and submit a patch. > > I'm posting this to the list cause I said > nearly a month ago that I'd started working > on SoleSeek again and have said nothing > much since. The work I've done on the peer > browsing code has familiarised me > somewhat with the network code so I > should now be able to contribute more > towards the really essential work that needs > to be done on the project. Hopefully CVS > will be back up soon so we can work > towards a release before the end of the > year. > > Matt > > P.S. I'll be upgrading to 10.3 when it comes > out on the 24th, anyone know how this > likely to affect my ability to code for > SoleSeek? If it comes to it I can always > keep a copy of 10.2 installed on a separate > partition and use it for SoleSeek work. The CVS is back to normal now, so when will we be seeing all of these goodie pieces of code commited? :) -- Markus Magnuson ma...@sa... ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ SoleSeek-Developer mailing list Sol...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer |
|
From: Markus M. <ma...@sa...> - 2003-10-15 09:29:50
|
l=F6rdagen den 11 oktober 2003 kl 09.32 skrev mp...@op...: > Hi All, > > As everyone's probably aware, SourceForge > have been working on their CVS servers > recently. The result has been that I've been > unable to checkout Robert's most recent > additions to the code, the most important > of which was the transition to AsyncSocket > from NetSocket. While waiting for CVS to > resume normal operation I've been working > on GUI and usability stuff. I've added > context menus where appropriate, added > provision for cancelling transfers in > progress, allowed the transfer list to be > cleared of finished and errored transfers, > allowed multiple selections in the search and > transfer fields (so you can download an > entire album or kill off all transfers for a > particular user at once for example). More > substantially, I've nearly completed the code > required to allow browsing of peers' files, > and the code required to get the bitrate and > length of every file locally shared. Once CVS > is running again I'll merge my changes with > the current source and submit a patch. > > I'm posting this to the list cause I said > nearly a month ago that I'd started working > on SoleSeek again and have said nothing > much since. The work I've done on the peer > browsing code has familiarised me > somewhat with the network code so I > should now be able to contribute more > towards the really essential work that needs > to be done on the project. Hopefully CVS > will be back up soon so we can work > towards a release before the end of the > year. > > Matt > > P.S. I'll be upgrading to 10.3 when it comes > out on the 24th, anyone know how this > likely to affect my ability to code for > SoleSeek? If it comes to it I can always > keep a copy of 10.2 installed on a separate > partition and use it for SoleSeek work. The CVS is back to normal now, so when will we be seeing all of these=20 goodie pieces of code commited? :) --=20 Markus Magnuson ma...@sa... |
|
From: Michael S. <ali...@ma...> - 2003-10-11 22:19:56
|
Xcode(for Mac Os X.3) is supposed to make coding easier... so you should have few problems... On Saturday, October 11, 2003, at 03:32 AM, mp...@op... wrote: > Hi All, > > As everyone's probably aware, SourceForge > have been working on their CVS servers > recently. The result has been that I've been > unable to checkout Robert's most recent > additions to the code, the most important > of which was the transition to AsyncSocket > from NetSocket. While waiting for CVS to > resume normal operation I've been working > on GUI and usability stuff. I've added > context menus where appropriate, added > provision for cancelling transfers in > progress, allowed the transfer list to be > cleared of finished and errored transfers, > allowed multiple selections in the search and > transfer fields (so you can download an > entire album or kill off all transfers for a > particular user at once for example). More > substantially, I've nearly completed the code > required to allow browsing of peers' files, > and the code required to get the bitrate and > length of every file locally shared. Once CVS > is running again I'll merge my changes with > the current source and submit a patch. > > I'm posting this to the list cause I said > nearly a month ago that I'd started working > on SoleSeek again and have said nothing > much since. The work I've done on the peer > browsing code has familiarised me > somewhat with the network code so I > should now be able to contribute more > towards the really essential work that needs > to be done on the project. Hopefully CVS > will be back up soon so we can work > towards a release before the end of the > year. > > Matt > > P.S. I'll be upgrading to 10.3 when it comes > out on the 24th, anyone know how this > likely to affect my ability to code for > SoleSeek? If it comes to it I can always > keep a copy of 10.2 installed on a separate > partition and use it for SoleSeek work. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php > _______________________________________________ > SoleSeek-Developer mailing list > Sol...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/soleseek-developer |
|
From: <mp...@op...> - 2003-10-11 07:32:07
|
Hi All, As everyone's probably aware, SourceForge have been working on their CVS servers recently. The result has been that I've been unable to checkout Robert's most recent additions to the code, the most important of which was the transition to AsyncSocket from NetSocket. While waiting for CVS to resume normal operation I've been working on GUI and usability stuff. I've added context menus where appropriate, added provision for cancelling transfers in progress, allowed the transfer list to be cleared of finished and errored transfers, allowed multiple selections in the search and transfer fields (so you can download an entire album or kill off all transfers for a particular user at once for example). More substantially, I've nearly completed the code required to allow browsing of peers' files, and the code required to get the bitrate and length of every file locally shared. Once CVS is running again I'll merge my changes with the current source and submit a patch. I'm posting this to the list cause I said nearly a month ago that I'd started working on SoleSeek again and have said nothing much since. The work I've done on the peer browsing code has familiarised me somewhat with the network code so I should now be able to contribute more towards the really essential work that needs to be done on the project. Hopefully CVS will be back up soon so we can work towards a release before the end of the year. Matt P.S. I'll be upgrading to 10.3 when it comes out on the 24th, anyone know how this likely to affect my ability to code for SoleSeek? If it comes to it I can always keep a copy of 10.2 installed on a separate partition and use it for SoleSeek work. |
|
From: Alex K. <ak...@se...> - 2003-10-06 12:07:20
|
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Arend van Beelen jr. wrote: > Also, to what extend is this document still up-to-date. While I managed > to successfully log in with the descriptions of the protocol in the > document, I immediately received a few messages with types not described > in the document. (Types 83, 84, 86, 87, 88, 90 and 104). 83-90 are numbers related to the tree-like network which the clients form to distribute search requests. 104 contains the interval between wishlist search requests that you should use. > Is there anything known about this? Yes, for further insights study the pyslsk/nicotine source code. The document you're talking about is largely based on that. :-) -- Alexander Homepage: http://www.sensi.org/~ak/ |
|
From: Robert S. <mi...@fr...> - 2003-10-05 19:52:54
|
On 10/5/03 3:17 PM, "Arend van Beelen jr." <ar...@au...> wrote: > Hi! > > Today I requested a SourceForge account for my project, giFT-SoulSeek. > It is a plugin for the giFT daemon (gift.sf.net) allowing it to access > the SoulSeek network. Right now I got code to build and extract packets > with which I can successfully log in. Besides the undocumented packets I > receive I talked about in an earlier mail, I also noticed that with a > _successful_ login, the reply from the server includes an integer at the > end of the packet containing the external IP of the connecting client. I > think we will both benefit if we try to cooperate on the protocol > documentation. Do you think it would be somehow possible for me to do > updates on this document? > > Thanks, > > Arend jr. Arend, that would be great. If you submit patches (http://sourceforge.net/projects/soleseek, click "Patches") for the docs, they will be applied promptly. |
