|
From: Mateusz L. <ma...@lo...> - 2015-03-25 09:10:32
|
On 17 March 2015 at 10:11, Sebastian Lauwers <seb...@gm...> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to recommend /against/ this. There are two major implications: > > - All PRs will default against `develop`, which is what you're asking, > - Upon cloning, the checked-out branch will be `develop`. Yes, this doesn't sound good to me. > I'm a believer in the idea that the default branch should be a stable > one. The only branch guaranteed to be stable in gitflow is master. That's my reasoning too. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net |