Smith / Feature Requests / #2 CreateObject()

#2 CreateObject()

Milestone: Next Release (example)

Status: open

Owner: nobody

Labels: Interface Improvements (example) (3)

Priority: 5

Updated: 2008-01-03

Created: 2007-05-08

Creator: Anonymous

Private: No

Please get CreateObject working, even if it is just for referencing cfc's initially. This is a huge feature that is used in a variety of projects and would be great if it worked. Implementation could be one type at a time so you can ensure each part works. Start with CFCs and then move on to java, cobra, vb, etc. Great work on Smith in general and keep up the good work.

Discussion

Nobody/Anonymous - 2007-08-31

Logged In: NO

I have to agree. I also agreed with the CFIMPORT request. These are the java integration tags that really need to work to get more users interested, IMO.

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Smith OS - 2008-01-03

summary: CreateObject --> CreateObject()
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Nobody/Anonymous - 2008-01-03

Logged In: NO

if i have a cfc with access=remote.. can it be invoked as a webservice ?

Shola Akinlade

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Nobody/Anonymous - 2008-01-04

Logged In: NO

a vote for CreateObject("java", ...)

Dan Plesse

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Nobody/Anonymous - 2008-01-04

Logged In: NO

another vote for CreateObject()

Michael Höfler

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Nobody/Anonymous - 2008-01-04

Logged In: NO

a vote for CreateObject()

Aaron Lynch

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Nobody/Anonymous - 2008-02-03

Logged In: NO

a vote for CreateObject too ! ;-)

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Nobody/Anonymous - 2008-02-08

Logged In: NO

I also vote for CreateObject. At least CreateObject("component",....). In our app we use this syntax for hundreds of CFC calls ...

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Nobody/Anonymous - 2008-05-19

Logged In: NO

I agree. Need createobject for CFCs please!

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Log in to post a comment.