|
From: ever w. <eve...@ya...> - 2005-12-21 05:29:56
|
Hi folks, I'm a newbie who came across my exact problem in your archives here: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=11960603 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 001 001 050 Pre-fail Always FAILING_NOW 1023 Disk = TOSHIBA MK8025GAS (14 months old) Many thanks to Sebastian for the clear, concise explanation (attached below). I understand the situation completely now. But my question is this: Is it possible to recover dead sectors and raise the Reallocated_Sector_Ct back above the threshold? My hard drive failed dismally last week. I spent the last 5 days recovering my data (successfully!) and eventually reformatting & reinstalling my OS. Now everything seems to work fine except that I continue to get the "SMART Failure Predicted" error message at boot up. I've even run CHKDSK several times w/ no errors found. Is it possible that my disk was fixed by reformatting? And if so, could the SMART error message be wrong? It seems to me that the SMART error reporting is based on a lifetime history of the drive. So obviously, a horrendous crash such as mine would be recorded as having exhausted the Reallocated_Sector_Ct. But if those sectors are later recovered, does SMART replenish the count, or does it still think I've used up all my reserves? That would explain why I keep getting the Failure Predicted message even though performance has returned to normal. As you can see, I'm terribly confused by all of this. (Also, I'm desperately wanting to believe that my disk is still healthy, because my warranty just expired 2 months ago!!) Regards, Rick On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Sebastian Vuorinen wrote: > On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 02:05 +0100, Carlos Silva wrote: > > Now I get this.. > > [root@localhost ~]# smartctl -a /dev/hda | grep "Reallocated_Sector_Ct" > > 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 001 001 050 Pre-fail > > Always FAILING_NOW 1023 > > Your harddrive has a number of reserve sectors to replace damaged > sectors. Once the number of reserve sectors left goes below a limit set > by the drive manufacturer SMART considers your drive as having failed. > This is the case here. > > The first number (001) is a normalized value derieved by a calculation > specified by the drive manufacturer. Normally it counts down from 100 as > sectors on your drive are replaced with spares. Remember this is > "normalized" and not a one to one mapping. The last number of the three > (050) is the limit set by the manufacturer. > > Also of interest is the very last value on the line (1023). It is the > raw value for this item. Usually this should show the number of actual > sectors damaged. Assuming the raw data is correct your drive has 1023 > failed sectors. That is a lot, possibly caused by dropping the drive or > serious overheating. What ever the cause, this drive can not be trusted > to store data and if you are still on warranty you should be able to get > a replacement. > > You can find more information on the relation of the "normalized" values > to the "raw" values from the smartctl manpage under the heading "-A, > --attributes". > > Sebastian > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |