From: Phil W. <ph...@su...> - 2002-12-02 19:55:12
|
Hi Bruce, > I decided to add the smartd.conf configuration file directives to the > table. Note that many of the directives there do not immediately map onto > corresponding smartctl ones, but there is often a relationship. OK. We obviously want some smartctl options to match smartd directives (--devicetype and -A/-S, for example), but I think that -T and -s should probably be removed altogether since it should be the job of only smartctl to enable or disable SMART features. Do you agree? > Do you think we should perhaps consider also changing some of the > smartd.conf Directive names to bring them more in line with the smartctl > command-line options, when there is a close relationship? I think it's > not a bad idea -- I think it might make the package easier to use and to > understand, in the long run. I couldn't agree more. I think we should change the syntax as well (to something like the one I suggested in an earlier mail). Phil. |