From: Bruce A. <ba...@gr...> - 2002-11-26 20:15:18
|
> > -s share > > -s captive > > > > rather than > > -s > > -s captive > > for the two cases? > > I misunderstood what you were saying. I assumed you meant that the short > options would not take arguments and would simply be renamed, but from your > example here it's clear you didn't mean that at all. Oh, OK. What I was trying to ask is "can we have a command line option whose argument is option. I think the answer is yes (optional_argument) for long opts; is it also possible for short opts? Bruce |