|
From: Gandalf C. <gan...@gm...> - 2016-08-02 12:54:24
|
2016-08-02 14:32 GMT+02:00 Robert S <ro...@sp...>: > My thresholds are based mostly on the fact I don't get to monitor the most > of the hard drives. I get to see them once a month, if that. I also know the > data is not backed up often, if at all, so I tend to be very conservative. > It is cheaper to replace than to do data recovery. > > And for those I can monitor regularly, they are in servers where scheduling > downtime is painful, and involves unpaid overtime for me (salaried). Having > a server fail in the middle of production due to a dying hard drive is not > good career-wise. Again, a whiff of problems and I replace. Since these are > hot plugable in a raid, I don't have to do unpaid overtime. Things just get > a little slow while the raid rebuilds. These disks are on production servers. Yes, I have backups, but as everybody, backups are never updated in real time and recovering a failed 3TB RAID-6 would become a real pain in the ass, as I have 22 virtual machines over it. But recovering a 600GB disks in this raid-6 would take 28 hours and these are very expensive disks. Changing a working disks with another would mean trashing away about 300-400$ and I want to be sure that this disk has really some issues. |