You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
(30) |
Mar
(123) |
Apr
(188) |
May
(90) |
Jun
(68) |
Jul
(129) |
Aug
(72) |
Sep
(97) |
Oct
(99) |
Nov
(168) |
Dec
(35) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(75) |
Feb
(55) |
Mar
(104) |
Apr
(49) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(47) |
Aug
(104) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(31) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(78) |
Feb
(76) |
Mar
(47) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(48) |
Aug
(43) |
Sep
(54) |
Oct
(25) |
Nov
(79) |
Dec
(39) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(18) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(17) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(72) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(55) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
| 2006 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(65) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
|
Dec
(5) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
|
Nov
(12) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
|
Apr
(4) |
May
|
Jun
(12) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(14) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(66) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
(100) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: info <in...@st...> - 2001-11-19 16:59:09
|
I get similar behavior from BorderManager 3.0 clients except that s/he requests pix.gif a hundred times plus multiple copies of the other images. Only when the load starts to increase, the URL gets malformed and a 404 error is generated. We changed the slash 404 page to a simpler one, and it now handles the load from this client a lot better now. Are you getting the same multiple request behavior *before* the URLs get malformed? BorderManager3.0 does read-ahead caching. It's sees imbedded images in the HTML and does not wait for the browser to request them. BorderManager 3.0 or some installations may not be smart enough to recognize that some images are requested multiple times in the same page. I don't know. Here's an article about BorderManager 3.0. Scroll down to "read ahead caching". http://www.nwconnection.com/oct.98/border08/ -Carl www.stopworldwar3.com on 11/19/01 11:32 AM, jesse hirsh at je...@ta... wrote: > > so i was tailing logs the other day and noticed some weird behaviour when > a client that goes by the name "BorderManager" browses any of my slash > sites. it seems that this client is part of novell groupware or something, > and for whatever reason seems to garble the url: > > tor-border.grey.net - - [19/Nov/2001:14:56:57 +0000] "GET > //neksis.openflows.org/images/pix.gif HTTP/1.0" 404 5211 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 > (compatible; BorderManager 3.0)" > > i.e. instead of requesting /images/pix.gif it goes for the full. this only > seems to happen with BorderManager 3.0. at first i was ready to just curse > and write off that particular client, but now i see a fair amount of > people using it... any thoughts? > > > 11:32am up 25 days, 20:15, 10 users, load average: 0.45, 0.41, 0.47 > > > _______________________________________________ > Slashcode-general mailing list > Sla...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-general > |
|
From: jesse h. <je...@ta...> - 2001-11-19 16:32:07
|
so i was tailing logs the other day and noticed some weird behaviour when a client that goes by the name "BorderManager" browses any of my slash sites. it seems that this client is part of novell groupware or something, and for whatever reason seems to garble the url: tor-border.grey.net - - [19/Nov/2001:14:56:57 +0000] "GET //neksis.openflows.org/images/pix.gif HTTP/1.0" 404 5211 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; BorderManager 3.0)" i.e. instead of requesting /images/pix.gif it goes for the full. this only seems to happen with BorderManager 3.0. at first i was ready to just curse and write off that particular client, but now i see a fair amount of people using it... any thoughts? 11:32am up 25 days, 20:15, 10 users, load average: 0.45, 0.41, 0.47 |
|
From: Markus A. <mar...@ub...> - 2001-11-19 07:19:49
|
sla...@i1... wrote: > I am trying to work with your code, but I am getting an error I didn't expect: > > [root@slash code]# ./test3.pl < ../eudora/___stories_to_autopost.mbx > Undefined subroutine &main::getSlashConf called at ./test3.pl line 67, <> > line 1021. > > The relevant line is: > > *I = getSlashConf(); Isn't this Slash 1.0.x syntax whereas you're running 2.x? Markus. |
|
From: barry <sla...@i1...> - 2001-11-18 17:38:33
|
Shane, I am trying to work with your code, but I am getting an error I didn't expect: [root@slash code]# ./test3.pl < ../eudora/___stories_to_autopost.mbx Undefined subroutine &main::getSlashConf called at ./test3.pl line 67, <> line 1021. The relevant line is: *I = getSlashConf(); Any suggestions? Thanks! Barry >Is this what you're thinking of? > ><URL: http://www.lottadot.com/files/mail2slash.txt > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Slashcode-general mailing list >Sla...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-general |
|
From: Jason H. <ja...@ne...> - 2001-11-18 17:31:07
|
I've been trying like hell to get mod_adbanners to display a "banner-ad" in a "slashbox". Any suggestions? -jh -- Jason Huckaby NErock.com Webmaster Portland, ME (207) 415-3142 |
|
From: shane <sh...@lo...> - 2001-11-17 13:23:08
|
At 08:12 PM 11/16/2001 -0500, Nathan Thaler wrote:
>Are there any unusual restrictions on graphics for topics in Slash? I've
>only gotten one graphic to show up in the "Edit Topics" section. All the
>images I'm working with are jpegs, which are no larger than 90x90
>pixels. The images were originally gifs, but I opened them with GIMP and
>saved them as jpegs.
After you've edit the images, and saved them with new names, make sure that:
1. the filename is lower case.
2. endings are .gif, .jpg or .png
3. after you select them in the drop down, and save the topic, if you want
them
to show up right away stop & restart apache.
|
|
From: Micah Y. <yo...@ho...> - 2001-11-17 01:33:03
|
On Friday 16 November 2001 08:12 pm, Nathan Thaler wrote: > Are there any unusual restrictions on graphics for topics in Slash? I've > only gotten one graphic to show up in the "Edit Topics" section. All the > images I'm working with are jpegs, which are no larger than 90x90 > pixels. The images were originally gifs, but I opened them with GIMP and > saved them as jpegs. What exactly is the filename extension? Make sure it is .gif or .jpg for 2.0, or that plus .png for 2.2. If it's .jpeg or has any caps (.JPG) it will miss the files. -- Like to travel? http://TravTalk.org Micah Yoder Internet Development http://yoderdev.com |
|
From: Nathan T. <nt...@ha...> - 2001-11-17 01:12:33
|
Are there any unusual restrictions on graphics for topics in Slash? I've only gotten one graphic to show up in the "Edit Topics" section. All the images I'm working with are jpegs, which are no larger than 90x90 pixels. The images were originally gifs, but I opened them with GIMP and saved them as jpegs. Thanks, Nathan Thaler |
|
From: Jamie M. <ja...@mc...> - 2001-11-16 22:22:03
|
sla...@i1... (barry) writes: > >>I noticed all my stories are still in the submissions table, > >>even though they have been accepted. Is it safe to delete them > >>en-masse? Yes. > >Are they also in the stories table? > > Yes, and they are also in the newstories table. > > I would think that stories first go into submissions, then get > moved to newstories and stories, then they age out of newstories > at some point. Does it work differently then that? Well, 2.2 doesn't have a 'newstories' table any more. And they don't get "moved" from submissions to stories, so much as copied; whatever was in submissions, stays. Submissions are never actually deleted, just marked so they don't show up in the bin. This has proved useful on Slashdot since we can go in and search for old submissions when the need arises (though not often enough that we've felt the need to provide a web-based search). Delete old submissions when you feel like it :) -- Jamie McCarthy ja...@mc... |
|
From: Jamie M. <ja...@mc...> - 2001-11-16 21:47:53
|
yo...@ho... (Micah Yoder) writes:
> 2. Mailbombing of site stats and daily headlines. Happened on
> both of my sites that are on 2.2. I realized that slashd was
> running in PST, not UTC. Changed that just now. Am wondering if
> that was the problem. Slashd.log complained about the time when
> it was running adminmail, saying:
> Thu Nov 15 23:07:46 2001 error: entry_time in the past, check TZ
> (1005919620 < 1005923266) adminmail.pl 7 6 * * * none
You'll probably also see a warning in the log from when slashd
started up:
if ($ENV{TZ} ne 'GMT') {
slashdLog(join(" ",
"Note: \$ENV{TZ}='$ENV{TZ}' not GMT, this may cause",
"'entry_time in the past' errors; did you not start",
"slashd with the init script?"
));
}
--
Jamie McCarthy
ja...@mc...
|
|
From: Chris N. <pu...@po...> - 2001-11-16 21:41:15
|
At 11:54 -0500 2001.11.15, Paul Stewart wrote: >-handle well under fairly heavy loading (500,000 pageviews daily >estimated) Slashdot gets a lot more than that. >-output static content to reduce loading on server (publish static html >pages) Yes. >-run with a backend MySQL database for speed/effeciency Yes. >-Apache/Redhat Linux configuration Yes. >-support a large number of articles (200-300 submissions daily) Yes. >-searchable articles option Yes. >-archive of older articles (still reachable by readers if need be >though) Yes. >-option to include photographs (autogenerated thumbnail / full size >link) Someone's written a plugin for this, I think. If not, it wouldn't be hard to extend Slash to do it. You could probably even hire someone off the list to do it in a day or three. :) >-multiple categories with main page "headline news" section Yes. -- Chris Nandor pu...@po... http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network pu...@os... http://osdn.com/ |
|
From: Chris N. <pu...@po...> - 2001-11-16 21:41:09
|
At 01:24 -0500 2001.11.16, Micah Yoder wrote: >Not to critisize, but more documentation for Slash would be great. Yep. >Better yet, I think we (the users of Slash) should be doing it. Let the paid >folks keep coding. :-) Yep. >This needn't be hard. When we go through the code and figure something out, >just write it down somewhere. An organized repository would be nice. I may >be able to set something up. What I would like to see first is an outline of the documentation. An outline for the API would be fairly easy. An outline for user/admin docs would be a lot harder. But it would make compiling and extending the documentation you're collecting a lot easier. >It should include readable discussions of the code, explaining the APIs, how >to write plugins, all the troubleshooting tips we can come up with. That >sort of stuff. There is a Slash book coming out, from O'Reilly. I don't know the due date, but it is in production. It is short on API, but long on many other things, and includes how to write plugins, etc. I'd recommend that if you really want to do this, start with the API, then when the book comes out, have the user/admin/troubleshooting docs extend what the book doesn't already have. My three cents, -- Chris Nandor pu...@po... http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network pu...@os... http://osdn.com/ |
|
From: barry <sla...@i1...> - 2001-11-16 18:01:05
|
At 06:53 AM 11/16/2001 -0500, you wrote: >At 06:31 PM 11/15/2001 -0800, you wrote: >>I noticed all my stories are still in the submissions table, even though >>they have been accepted. Is it safe to delete them en-masse? > >Are they also in the stories table? Yes, and they are also in the newstories table. I would think that stories first go into submissions, then get moved to newstories and stories, then they age out of newstories at some point. Does it work differently then that? Barry |
|
From: Brian A. <br...@ta...> - 2001-11-16 17:58:06
|
On Thu, 2001-11-15 at 13:20, Micah Yoder wrote: > The topic editor in 2.2 now lets you tell which sections a topic belongs to. > What is that supposed to do? Can't you still use any topic in any section? > Or what's the deal with those? When you edit the topic mark it for all of the sections you want to be able to use it. Here is the thing, on sites with a lot of topics, the menu to select topics become a bit of a nightmare. This allows you to keep things seperate. Also, on sites that have multiple sections working in isolation this keeps things nice and clean. For example: http://software.tangent.org/submit.pl and http://www.tangent.org/submit.pl Exact same accounts, exact same database. www happens to be an isolated section (how I do this is a little on the undocumented side, for those who know about the DB hack I used to use, I am no longer having to do even it). If you look at the submit's pulldown you can see how only topics which are particular to that site are found. BTW all three sites that share that db, (www,software, media) all have their own Apache instance. So this does eat up some memory. Somewhere in the back of my mind I actually have a solution for this. At the moment it doesn't bother me though. That machine is running 7 or so slashsites without any issues. -Brian -- _______________________________________________________ Brian Aker, br...@ta... Slashdot Senior Developer Seattle, Washington http://tangent.org/~brian/ Email/Jabber br...@ta... _______________________________________________________ You can't grep a dead tree. |
|
From: Rob \CmdrTaco\ M. <ma...@sl...> - 2001-11-16 13:56:15
|
On Friday 16 November 2001 01:24 am, Micah Yoder wrote: > Not to critisize, but more documentation for Slash would be great. > > Better yet, I think we (the users of Slash) should be doing it. Let the > paid folks keep coding. :-) Hazah! |
|
From: Eric D. <eri...@ja...> - 2001-11-16 13:47:49
|
Yes yes! A repository for slash documentation would be great! Micah Yoder wrote: >Not to critisize, but more documentation for Slash would be great. > >Better yet, I think we (the users of Slash) should be doing it. Let the paid >folks keep coding. :-) > >This needn't be hard. When we go through the code and figure something out, >just write it down somewhere. An organized repository would be nice. I may >be able to set something up. > >The good thing is that the Slash code is fairly easy to read. (Thanks guys!) > >It should include readable discussions of the code, explaining the APIs, how >to write plugins, all the troubleshooting tips we can come up with. That >sort of stuff. > >Any thoughts? > |
|
From: Bruno P. <br...@po...> - 2001-11-16 11:55:07
|
On Fri 16-Nov-2001 at 01:24:14AM -0500, Micah Yoder wrote: > Not to critisize, but more documentation for Slash would be great. > > Better yet, I think we (the users of Slash) should be doing it. > This needn't be hard. When we go through the code and figure > something out, just write it down somewhere. An organized repository > would be nice. I may be able to set something up. Myself, I would be happy to see material like that posted here where I can find it. It would push the signal:noise ratio in the right direction and slashcode-general isn't very busy anyway. -- Bruno |
|
From: Micah Y. <yo...@ho...> - 2001-11-16 10:58:15
|
Alessio's suggestion fixed #1 AND #3! Now my only big issue is the mailbombing... -- Like to travel? http://TravTalk.org Micah Yoder Internet Development http://yoderdev.com |
|
From: Micah Y. <yo...@ho...> - 2001-11-16 10:28:04
|
> With 2.2, topics belong to a section, and the behaviour of > standalone/part of site sections is different than in previous versions. > > I have yet to completely understand how all of this works, but I suggest > you have a look at it. For example, did you put your new topic in the > 'Articles' section? Good grief. Looks like you're right. I just selectd one topic and checked all the sections, and now it appears on the list! So you have to select each section that a topic can appear in!!? That kinda sucks. I want all topics to be able to be in any section. -- Like to travel? http://TravTalk.org Micah Yoder Internet Development http://yoderdev.com |
|
From: Alessio B. <al...@al...> - 2001-11-16 09:35:12
|
Micah Yoder wrote: > 1. I added a whole long list of topics to a site. They show up in the > topics.pl page and the search dropdown and in admin. But not in the story > submission dropdown, which only lists Linux/News/Slash/Journal (I deleted > Slashdot, and it is indeed missing from that list). With 2.2, topics belong to a section, and the behaviour of standalone/part of site sections is different than in previous versions. I have yet to completely understand how all of this works, but I suggest you have a look at it. For example, did you put your new topic in the 'Articles' section? -- Alessio F. Bragadini al...@al... APL Financial Services http://village.albourne.com Nicosia, Cyprus phone: +357-22-755750 "It is more complicated than you think" -- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925 |
|
From: Micah Y. <yo...@ho...> - 2001-11-16 09:24:17
|
Not to critisize, but more documentation for Slash would be great. Better yet, I think we (the users of Slash) should be doing it. Let the paid folks keep coding. :-) This needn't be hard. When we go through the code and figure something out, just write it down somewhere. An organized repository would be nice. I may be able to set something up. The good thing is that the Slash code is fairly easy to read. (Thanks guys!) It should include readable discussions of the code, explaining the APIs, how to write plugins, all the troubleshooting tips we can come up with. That sort of stuff. Any thoughts? -- Like to travel? http://TravTalk.org Micah Yoder Internet Development http://yoderdev.com |
|
From: Micah Y. <yo...@ho...> - 2001-11-16 09:17:12
|
1. I added a whole long list of topics to a site. They show up in the topics.pl page and the search dropdown and in admin. But not in the story submission dropdown, which only lists Linux/News/Slash/Journal (I deleted Slashdot, and it is indeed missing from that list). 2. Mailbombing of site stats and daily headlines. Happened on both of my sites that are on 2.2. I realized that slashd was running in PST, not UTC. Changed that just now. Am wondering if that was the problem. Slashd.log complained about the time when it was running adminmail, saying: 005923263) adminmail.pl 7 6 * * * none Thu Nov 15 23:07:43 2001 adminmail.pl end (1.11s; adminmail.pl 1005923263s late)Thu Nov 15 23:07:45 2001 adminmail.pl begin Thu Nov 15 23:07:45 2001 Send Admin Mail Begin Thu Nov 15 23:07:46 2001 Send Admin Mail End Thu Nov 15 23:07:46 2001 error: entry_time in the past, check TZ (1005919620 < 1005923266) adminmail.pl 7 6 * * * none dunno if that has anything to do with it. We'll see tomorrow now that it's correctly running in UTC. 3. When submitting a story and clicking Preview, the topics drop-down is completely gone! Nothing there. It has the section pulldown though. After clicking Submit, it then says it submitted, but the commit fails due to an SQL error, topic ID cannot be null. Well obviously.... but why isn't the topic list showing up??? None of the submit templates were modified. This is only happening on one site, the other is fine. I'm gonna hit the code to try to figure this out, but if anyone has ideas I'd appreciate it! Thanks, Micah -- Like to travel? http://TravTalk.org Micah Yoder Internet Development http://yoderdev.com |
|
From: barry <sla...@i1...> - 2001-11-16 02:33:24
|
I noticed all my stories are still in the submissions table, even though they have been accepted. Is it safe to delete them en-masse? Thanks! Barry |
|
From: Micah Y. <yo...@ho...> - 2001-11-16 00:20:02
|
Hi, The topic editor in 2.2 now lets you tell which sections a topic belongs to. What is that supposed to do? Can't you still use any topic in any section? Or what's the deal with those? Thanks, Micah -- Like to travel? http://TravTalk.org Micah Yoder Internet Development http://yoderdev.com |
|
From: barry <sla...@i1...> - 2001-11-15 22:52:10
|
I figured out my problem before I pulled all my hair out- the test Perl program was trying to write to a user home directory with insufficient permissions. Thanks for the help! Barry At 04:44 PM 11/15/2001 -0500, Eloy A. Paris wrote: >On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 11:23:35AM -0800, barry wrote: > > > In /etc/I made a link: > > [root@slash smrsh]# ls -al > > total 8 > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 15 10:55 . > > drwxr-xr-x 40 root root 4096 Nov 15 10:24 .. > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 37 Nov 15 10:55 test3.pl -> > > /home/barry/autoprocess/code/test3.pl > >I am sorry, my bad, I see you did create the symlink. |