You can subscribe to this list here.
2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(29) |
Dec
(101) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
Jan
(90) |
Feb
(101) |
Mar
(173) |
Apr
(141) |
May
(38) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(9) |
2002 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(7) |
2003 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(25) |
Dec
(22) |
2004 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(18) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(4) |
2005 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
2006 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(7) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Scott J. <sc...@na...> - 2001-11-19 17:24:12
|
More datapoints. This is 2.0.0 code. I still think I'm doing something *really* basic wrong: Slash appears to call user authentication in the modules I can find more like this: $slashdb = getCurrentDB(); $userstuff=$slashdb->getUserAuthenticate($ldapuname, $ldappassword); and then work with the result. In fact, this is exactly how Apache::User::getUserAuthenticate calls it. When I try this, exactly like this, in my own program, I get a null ('', undefined?) reply. This is why A::U::gUA returns the anon UID... the result from the mySQL call is null, which is then fed to isAnon, which triggers one of isAnon's conditions. When I look inside the code of the mySQL call, I see this on line 597 of MySQL.pm: my($self, $user, $passwd, $kind) = @_; then this on line 601: return unless $user && $passwd; This is almost certainly showing my lack of perl experience, but it seems that the mySQL method is expecting 4 and exactly 4 arguments. Also, it will return immediately if it doesn't see a $passwd variable that actually contains something. So, it seems to me that when I only feed it two arguments, it will never see $passwd (because the values I fed it got stored in $self and $user instead) and therefore never authenticate. Is this correct? I tried feeding it three values, but that didn't work either, perhaps (probably) because the above assumptions are wrong or the $self variable actually needs to be something important. Here's how I actually use the module right now: A web page in <site>/htdocs called login.shtml is a form that asks for username & password. Submit carries it over to basicLogin.pl also in <site>/htdocs. Am I doing something wrong here? $slashdb = getCurrentDB() *does* return something, but I don't know how to tinker with it to see if it's providing me with the right something. When evaluated as a scalar I get something like Slash::DB=HASH(0x891327c). This is a functioning slash site, so it's bound to be working somewhere. Apologies for the newbie ramblings. This is very frustrating. Let me know if there's anything else I can provide you. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. |
From: Scott J. <sc...@na...> - 2001-11-19 16:16:52
|
Unfortunately I don't have all that much experience with debugging statements in perl yet. My problem. Is there some spot in the existing slashcode where this function is called correctly? I can't find any so far. > If I were you, I'd add a bunch of "print STDERR" debugging statements to > userLogin in Slash::Apache::User and getUserAuthenticate in > Slash::DB::MySQL, and see what's going on. > > |
From: Scott J. <sc...@na...> - 2001-11-16 20:49:32
|
I'm trying to work up an LDAP authentication system. Instead of trying to tear out the existing system, my strategy is to work with what's already there. See http://slashcode.com/article.pl?sid=01/11/12/1640251&mode=thread for an overview of what I'm trying for. I've got the widget that verifies the username & password against the LDAP directory; now I want to figure out how to call the slash widgets that perform the same function there. Here's how I'm trying to do it: $userInfo = Slash::Apache::User->userLogin($providedName, $providedPassword); but all I get returned is the anon-coward UID, which, when I read the code, seems to be what you are supposed to get when userLogin can't log in using what you provide. This happens even if I set the two variables to known-good values. What am I doing wrong? Thanks in advance for any help you can give. I'm about as green a newbie as they get, so apologies in advance if this doesn't make any sense at all or if I haven't provided enough info. |
From: shane <sh...@lo...> - 2001-11-12 23:51:11
|
I saw the users_acl in the sql schema. Anyone have any examples of code that uses it or docs for it? Grepping for 'acl' in the code shows some code in Slash/DB/MySQL/MySQL.pm setUser $self->sqlReplace('users_acl', { uid => $uid, name => $_->[1]->{name}, value => $_->[1]->{value}, }); and getUser but otherwise I couldn't find anything in slash that uses them. I'm interested, because I've got a site that has many sections, and each section needs to be maintained by a different user, and only that user. Other 'section authors' shouldn't be able to create/modify/del stories in other sections, nor templates from other sections. As far as I can tell, it'd be easier to do this with acl's then with seclev's. Any suggestions? Shane |
From: Chris N. <pu...@po...> - 2001-11-07 16:48:18
|
Hi all. Finally, a new release of Slash! Check out the story on Slashcode for links and more information. http://slashcode.com/article.pl?sid=01/11/07/1641258 -- Chris Nandor pu...@po... http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network pu...@os... http://osdn.com/ |
From: Chris N. <pu...@po...> - 2001-11-07 16:11:17
|
At 12:11 -0700 2001.11.05, chromatic wrote: >Running from CVS after 2.1.1, I was unable to set the Comments Disabled mode >on a story through the Admin menu. Looking through the code, nothing seems >to care about that flag, beyond setting and retrieving it from the database. >I've written two very small patches to make things work, and they appear to >do just fine on my machine. > >The patch offsets may be a little weird, as I've hacked a couple of other >things that aren't ready yet. > >I'd like to run these by you folks first for comments and questions before >doing anything more with them. They look OK to me, but I don't know if there is any other place, offhand, where the code would need to check. In any event, it is too late for 2.2.0; it could perhaps be included in 2.2.x later, but I see no big rush, and no reason not to just stick it in 2.3.x. -- Chris Nandor pu...@po... http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network pu...@os... http://osdn.com/ |
From: Chris N. <pu...@po...> - 2001-11-06 09:08:30
|
At 12:16 +0300 2001.10.18, Alessio Bragadini wrote: >In Fry this problem seems to be addressed, but there are differences in >different areas of the code: > > <INPUT TYPE="SUBMIT" VALUE="Save"> > <INPUT TYPE="HIDDEN" NAME="op" VALUE="save"> > >looks safe to translate in the first line, because I suppose the script >relies on the value of 'op'. Yes. >Other piece of code: > ><INPUT TYPE="SUBMIT" NAME="op" VALUE="Update"> ><INPUT TYPE="SUBMIT" NAME="op" VALUE="GenQuickies"> > >looks unsafe to me - and maybe should be reported as a bug. >(this comes from slashcode/templates/subEdAdmin;submit;default but there >are a ton) > >Am I right? Well, right in that it would be nice to do something about it, but wrong in that it is a bug, IMO. A bad design decision, perhaps ... :/ it would be difficult to fix at this point, and I don't have a good idea of how it could be dealt with without much pain. -- Chris Nandor pu...@po... http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network pu...@os... http://osdn.com/ |
From: Chris N. <pu...@po...> - 2001-11-06 09:08:23
|
At 01:00 +0200 2001.10.29, Alessio Bragadini wrote: >I was wondering if the DOCTYPE shown by the pages generated by Slash >is correct: it's HTML 3.2 but maybe it would be better to send >HTML 4.01 Transitional or similar. > >It is stored in html-header;misc;default. The actual HTML generated by Slash is probably closest to 3.2, not 4.0. Hence, DOCTYPE is 3.2. -- Chris Nandor pu...@po... http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network pu...@os... http://osdn.com/ |
From: Chris N. <pu...@po...> - 2001-11-06 09:04:20
|
Hi everybody. This here is a last call for slash 2.2.0. If you want something fixed for slash 2.2.0, now is the last chance to file a bug report. This is only for important bugs, or installation/upgrading bugs. Please as usual file it on SourceForge, and then let me know via email so I don't miss it. :-) -- Chris Nandor pu...@po... http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network pu...@os... http://osdn.com/ |
From: chromatic <chr...@rm...> - 2001-11-05 19:18:26
|
Hi all, Running from CVS after 2.1.1, I was unable to set the Comments Disabled mode on a story through the Admin menu. Looking through the code, nothing seems to care about that flag, beyond setting and retrieving it from the database. I've written two very small patches to make things work, and they appear to do just fine on my machine. The patch offsets may be a little weird, as I've hacked a couple of other things that aren't ready yet. I'd like to run these by you folks first for comments and questions before doing anything more with them. (By the way, there's a newer version of the Print plugin available with some bugfixes. http://wgz.org/chromatic/slash/Print-plugin.tar.gz) see ya, -- c |
From: Alessio B. <al...@se...> - 2001-10-28 23:00:31
|
I was wondering if the DOCTYPE shown by the pages generated by Slash is correct: it's HTML 3.2 but maybe it would be better to send HTML 4.01 Transitional or similar. It is stored in html-header;misc;default. -- Alessio F. Bragadini al...@se... |
From: <no...@so...> - 2001-10-24 04:37:44
|
Patches item #474342, was opened at 2001-10-23 21:37 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304421&aid=474342&group_id=4421 Category: Development branch Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: chromatic (chromatic) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add LINK tag support to HTML headers Initial Comment: The latest versions of Mozilla (and existing versions of OmniWeb) support the HTML 2 LINK tag. This allows extra navigation and categorization support within a document. I've added support for these tags to the 'header' template (default section, misc page). If present, it links to the previous and next stories, as well as the section home page and a search for other stories by the same author. This is a pretty cool feature in Mozilla, in my opinion, and it was requested by Mozilla developers. (http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22538&cid=2423922) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304421&aid=474342&group_id=4421 |
From: Alvaro <ac...@ba...> - 2001-10-23 14:19:43
|
En mar, 2001-10-23 a 15:56, shane escribi=F3: >=20 > Has anyone experimented with file upload code under 2.1 or 2.2? >=20 > If so, I'd like to hear what you went through. I've got a plugin > that desperately needs the ability, but I'm lacking the time > to take a crack at it. The next days a patch in Fry is going to be applied in order to support=20 multivalue params and http uploads. If you want this patches, I can send them to you. I have play with slash 2.0 and the upload feature for a client project and it works very well. I can send you the modifications I have done in slash 2.0, in the importFile function. I am talking with Krow to see if the upload functionality can go in Fry. Cheers -- Alvaro >=20 > Thanks, > Shane >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Slashcode-development mailing list > Sla...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-development >=20 |
From: shane <sh...@lo...> - 2001-10-23 13:50:04
|
Has anyone experimented with file upload code under 2.1 or 2.2? If so, I'd like to hear what you went through. I've got a plugin that desperately needs the ability, but I'm lacking the time to take a crack at it. Thanks, Shane |
From: <no...@so...> - 2001-10-22 14:09:58
|
Patches item #473674, was opened at 2001-10-22 07:09 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304421&aid=473674&group_id=4421 Category: Development branch Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alessio Bragadini (alessio) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Remove hard-wired op from 'moderate' but Initial Comment: Splitting parameter op from the submit button to have a button 'moderate' that can be translated in printCommComments;misc;default ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304421&aid=473674&group_id=4421 |
From: Alessio B. <al...@al...> - 2001-10-18 09:16:25
|
Hi, I'm in the process of translating Slash and one of the things that wasn't doable in Bender was translating also the action names that appear on buttons (acs submitted a patch that didn't enter the codebase, I believe). In Fry this problem seems to be addressed, but there are differences in different areas of the code: <INPUT TYPE="SUBMIT" VALUE="Save"> <INPUT TYPE="HIDDEN" NAME="op" VALUE="save"> looks safe to translate in the first line, because I suppose the script relies on the value of 'op'. Other piece of code: <INPUT TYPE="SUBMIT" NAME="op" VALUE="Update"> <INPUT TYPE="SUBMIT" NAME="op" VALUE="GenQuickies"> looks unsafe to me - and maybe should be reported as a bug. (this comes from slashcode/templates/subEdAdmin;submit;default but there are a ton) Am I right? -- Alessio F. Bragadini al...@al... APL Financial Services http://village.albourne.com Nicosia, Cyprus phone: +357-2-755750 "It is more complicated than you think" -- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925 |
From: <no...@so...> - 2001-10-17 22:06:03
|
Patches item #472258, was opened at 2001-10-17 15:06 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304421&aid=472258&group_id=4421 Category: MAIN branch Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dan Stahlke (danstahlke) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Template Finder Initial Comment: This is a script that you can put in your slash directory that will make it easy to find which templates contain which keywords. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304421&aid=472258&group_id=4421 |
From: <no...@so...> - 2001-09-15 04:00:56
|
Patches item #461757, was opened at 2001-09-14 21:00 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304421&aid=461757&group_id=4421 Category: Development branch Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: chromatic (chromatic) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Apply Content Filters on User Karma Initial Comment: This patch adds a 'karma' field to content filters. If a karma level is specified, the filter will not be applied to comments from users with karma above the level. It modifies the content_filters database schema, as well as the default content filters SQL statements. In addition, it adds the karma field to the display and edit templates for content filters. The default behavior is not changed from current behavior. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304421&aid=461757&group_id=4421 |
From: <no...@so...> - 2001-09-13 15:42:55
|
Patches item #461247, was opened at 2001-09-13 08:42 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304421&aid=461247&group_id=4421 Category: MAIN branch Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Axel Beckert (xtaran) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Patch for 2.0.0 Makefile on Solaris Initial Comment: The original Makefile fails on Solaris, because on Solaris the sh is a jsh and not a bash. So the used negations in if-statements are not parsed correctly. The following patch should fix this (letting test do the negations, not sh) and still be working under bash respective Linux: *** Makefile.original Thu Sep 13 16:33:16 2001 --- Makefile Thu Sep 13 17:26:55 2001 *************** *** 57,63 **** # version of perl. # I should also grab an install-sh instead of using $(CP) slash: ! if ! [ $(RPM) ] ; then \ (cd Slash; $(PERL) Makefile.PL; make); \ else \ (cd Slash; $(PERL) Makefile.PL INSTALLSITEARCH=$(INSTALLSITEARCH) INSTALLSITELIB=$(INSTALLSITELIB) INSTALLMAN3DIR=$(INSTALLMAN3DIR); make); \ --- 57,63 ---- # version of perl. # I should also grab an install-sh instead of using $(CP) slash: ! if [ ! "$(RPM)" ] ; then \ (cd Slash; $(PERL) Makefile.PL; make); \ else \ (cd Slash; $(PERL) Makefile.PL INSTALLSITEARCH=$(INSTALLSITEARCH) INSTALLSITELIB=$(INSTALLSITELIB) INSTALLMAN3DIR=$(INSTALLMAN3DIR); make); \ *************** *** 68,74 **** for a in $(PLUGINS); do \ (cd $$a; \ if [ -f Makefile.PL ]; then \ ! if ! [ $(RPM) ] ; then \ $(PERL) Makefile.PL; make;\ else \ $(PERL) Makefile.PL INSTALLSITEARCH=$(INSTALLSITEARCH) INSTALLSITELIB=$(INSTALLSITELIB) INSTALLMAN3DIR=$(INSTALLMAN3DIR); make; \ --- 68,74 ---- for a in $(PLUGINS); do \ (cd $$a; \ if [ -f Makefile.PL ]; then \ ! if [ ! "$(RPM)" ] ; then \ $(PERL) Makefile.PL; make;\ else \ $(PERL) Makefile.PL INSTALLSITEARCH=$(INSTALLSITEARCH) INSTALLSITELIB=$(INSTALLSITELIB) INSTALLMAN3DIR=$(INSTALLMAN3DIR); make; \ *************** *** 99,105 **** if [ -f Makefile ]; then \ make install; \ elif [ -f Makefile.PL ]; then \ ! if ! [ $(RPM) ] ; then \ $(PERL) Makefile.PL; \ else \ $(PERL) Makefile.PL INSTALLSITEARCH=$(INSTALLSITEARCH) INSTALLSITELIB=$(INSTALLSITELIB) INSTALLMAN3DIR=$(INSTALLMAN3DIR); \ --- 99,105 ---- if [ -f Makefile ]; then \ make install; \ elif [ -f Makefile.PL ]; then \ ! if [ ! "$(RPM)" ] ; then \ $(PERL) Makefile.PL; \ else \ $(PERL) Makefile.PL INSTALLSITEARCH=$(INSTALLSITEARCH) INSTALLSITELIB=$(INSTALLSITELIB) INSTALLMAN3DIR=$(INSTALLMAN3DIR); \ And here's a more overviewable, non-context-based version of this patch: 60c60 < if ! [ $(RPM) ] ; then \ --- > if [ ! "$(RPM)" ] ; then \ 71c71 < if ! [ $(RPM) ] ; then \ --- > if [ ! "$(RPM)" ] ; then \ 102c102 < if ! [ $(RPM) ] ; then \ --- > if [ ! "$(RPM)" ] ; then \ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304421&aid=461247&group_id=4421 |
From: chromatic <chr...@rm...> - 2001-09-11 23:01:02
|
Hi everyone, I've spent a few minutes looking at Slash::Utility::Access. With a few changes, it would be possible for filterOk() to apply comment filters only on users with karma below a specific threshold. This gives more trusted users less obstacles to overcome to post successfully. There are two options. First, the entire function could be subverted by a check before the loop. Something like: return 1 if $user->{karma} > 20; In this case, it's probably best to add a configuration variable instead of hardcoding the example value of 20. The other option is to add a karma field to each comment filter, and to do the check in the loop. This requires more work, editing the schema, modifying the comment filter template, and the associated .pl file. It's a finer-grained solution, though. My preference is for the second solution. If either of these sound useful, I'd be happy to produce a patch. Best, -- chromatic |
From: <no...@so...> - 2001-08-28 21:44:27
|
Patches item #456303, was opened at 2001-08-28 14:44 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304421&aid=456303&group_id=4421 Category: Development branch Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: chromatic (chromatic) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Prepend Site Directory to Log Directive Initial Comment: Running Apache 1.3.20 and Fry from CVS, the logs from my individual sites always ended up under /usr/local/apache_logs/. A two-line change to each site configuration file got them back where they belonged, under /usr/local/slash/sites/sitename/logs/. This patch fixes install-slashsite to make this explicit. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304421&aid=456303&group_id=4421 |
From: Alessio B. <al...@al...> - 2001-08-17 08:03:37
|
I've just managed to run my first Bender on Digital Unix (whoa!) and I've noticed there are no rss files created for different (standalone) sections: there are rdf (i.e. RSS 0.9) and xml versions, but not rss and wml as is main site. Is this a bug or a design decision? -- Alessio F. Bragadini al...@al... APL Financial Services http://village.albourne.com Nicosia, Cyprus phone: +357-2-755750 "It is more complicated than you think" -- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925 |
From: <no...@so...> - 2001-08-10 20:38:47
|
Patches item #449917, was opened at 2001-08-10 13:38 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304421&aid=449917&group_id=4421 Category: Development branch Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: chromatic (chromatic) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: POD Patch for docs/HOWTO-Templates Initial Comment: This fixes an extraneous line break in HOWTO-Templates that causes POD to misrender a question. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304421&aid=449917&group_id=4421 |
From: Ralf <rr...@jo...> - 2001-08-04 10:02:15
|
Wow, any idea on when that will be? RRK -----Original Message----- From: sla...@li... [mailto:sla...@li...]On Behalf Of Brian Aker Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 2:36 PM Personally I would give fry a week after slashdot is running it. Course, playing with it right now is cool too, I just wouldn't use it for a production site. -Brian _______________________________________________ Slashcode-development mailing list Sla...@li... http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-development |
From: Brian A. <br...@ta...> - 2001-08-03 21:51:27
|
Eric Dannewitz wrote: > > I was feeling good and decided to CVS up to Fry (I was using Bender), > and try it out. > > I updated all my Perl Libraries via CPAN, and then went and did a make > && make install on fry. > Things ain't working. I get this message when starting slash: There is no bender->fry scripts written yet (anyone want to write one?). Personally I would give fry a week after slashdot is running it. Course, playing with it right now is cool too, I just wouldn't use it for a production site. -Brian |