From: Rob M. <ma...@sl...> - 2003-06-13 14:33:03
|
This is a great start. I'd love to see a template that looks like the default template- the CSS & Strict conversions are in many cases smaller because they don't have as pretty of a layout. Makes comparing page sizes a bit of an apples & oranges sorta thing. Also, regarding the page sizes- you'll notice that there's an *ahem* bug in Flat & Nested mode that causes large pages to become insanely large. Basically commentlimit is being ignored on large pages. Hopefully that bug will be found and fixed in the next week or 2 since it tends to make those HTML pages ridiculously large. On Friday, June 13, 2003, at 06:50 AM, Peter Winnberg wrote: >> That's quite a difference!! If you haven't checked out pty's >> slashstrict >> conversion, and you're interested in css, you should! >> http://strict.openflows.org >> >> Shane > > :) > > I plan to do more tests like this once I'm happy with the strict > templates ( probably soon ). > > Even if you're not into CSS / web standards as much as I'm .. it's > really a good idea to use a external style sheet at least for the > comment display ( these pages tend to be big if you have many comments > ) > if you want smaller pages. > > -- > Peter Winnberg <pe...@op...> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay > Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: > http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 > _______________________________________________ > Slashcode-general mailing list > Sla...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-general |