From: Michael J. <mi...@fi...> - 2001-04-26 02:14:53
|
Hi, Chris: Actually, just that one. I saw this on the site and wonder if it's related: slash 2.0.0-pre3 Released posted by pudge on Wednesday April 25, @04:45PM Sorry to all of you who just downloaded 2.0.0-pre2; thanks to all of you who helped us crush the bugs in that release! There were some bad ones (nothing major, just enough to make the site not work ... ) so we decided to do one more prerelease. This fixed syntax errors, bad method calls, and (hopefully) the Makefile for FreeBSD. So again, we hope to release 2.0.0 next week. Check this out, let us know what breaks by submitting bugs on SourceForge, and we'll do this. Download the latest via FTP or HTTP, and read the change log below. ( Read More... | 539 bytes in body | 1 comment ) I reinstalled the pre-3 release and now it's running. There are a few minor issues, but I want to look at all my configuration information before commenting. Thanks! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Nandor" <pu...@po...> To: <sla...@li...> Cc: <sla...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 7:04 PM Subject: Re: [Slashcode-general] error > At 17:57 -0700 2001.04.25, Michael Johnson wrote: > >Slash 1.* worked perfectly on my system so I have been able to install Slash > >and all it's deps. Serious problems with Slash 2+ though. > > You say "problems," plural. What other serious problem do you see? > > -- > Chris Nandor pu...@po... http://pudge.net/ > Open Source Development Network pu...@os... http://osdn.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Slashcode-general mailing list > Sla...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashcode-general |