[Sisc-users] Possible docs patches
Brought to you by:
mradestock,
scgmille
From: Norman G. <no...@as...> - 2006-03-27 21:09:36
|
Greetings. I've attached a small patch with documentation suggestions. These are against the current SISC HEAD. This contains a few additions to the recently expanded (thanks!) description of how to call Scheme from Java. In particular, it mentions the execute(sisc.interpreter.SchemeCaller) method as well as the execute (sisc.interpreter.AppContext,sisc.interpreter.SchemeCaller) method, and suggests that the former is the preferred one if the programmer has no particular need for a non-default AppContext or Heap. This was the impression I'd gleaned from the recent discussion of this new interface here -- perhaps I'm wrong. My aim was to emphasise the simplicity of the new interface. I made a few other wording changes nearby that seemed worth while. The patch also adds javadoc comments to a (very) few routines. This addition isn't systematic, but consists, more-or-less, of the notes I made when I was recently trawling through the API. These javadocs now compile without warnings. As an addition, I added a line to build.xml which makes it read a file build.properties if it exists in the current directory. This is very convenient if you have required files in non-standard locations, or if you want to install in a non-standard location (myself, I override doc.style and prefix in this file). It has no effect if the file is missing. As a final point, can I suggest that the javadocs be installed alongside the manual? Since the manual does refer to the API, it takes one a little by surprise to find that the javadocs aren't installed. I hope these suggestions are useful. Use, discard or hack them at your pleasure! Best wishes, Norman -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Norman Gray / http://nxg.me.uk eurovotech.org / University of Leicester, UK |