Re: [Siproxd-users] dejitter in 0.6.0 and H.264 RTP streams

[Thomas R. <tr...@gm...>]

Hi Marcel,

Seems that I'll nedd to have a closer look at this.
You would'nt happen to have a network trace (inbound and outbound side
of siproxd) for such an starting RTP stream?

However, it will likely be next year when I get time to do this...

Regards,
/Thomas

On  9 Dec, Marcel Wiget wrote:
> Hi
> 
> i recently added siproxd 0.6.0 into m0n0wall 1.3 branch
> (http://m0n0.ch/wall) to work around some NAT issues I have with HD
> Video endpoints (who aren't too smart when it comes to NAT).
> 
> Trouble was, I often got good video quality one way, but not the
> other. I suspected initially   performance problems with the low
> powered hardware (WRAP).
> 
> Looking at traces, I found many of  blocks of 5 packets sent out with
> reverse sequence numbers for H.264 packets (sent out the public
> interface). Haven't checked other RTP streams. Recompiling without
> dejitter resolved the problem.
> 
> Now it really works nice. Thanks for this great software!
> 
> Marcel
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: 
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services for
> just about anything Open Source.
> http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
> _______________________________________________
> Siproxd-users mailing list
> Sip...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/siproxd-users

-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GE d s+: a C+++ UL+++ P+++ L++++ E-- W++ N++ o+ K w-- 
O- M- V PS+ PE Y-- PGP++ t+ 5++ X R tv+ b+ DI+ D+ 
G e++ h r+++ y+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------