Menu
▾
▴
RE: [Sipp-users] 200 Reply after INVITE request...
|
From: Gayraud, R. <ric...@hp...> - 2004-04-23 16:32:56
|
40 seconds ? You mean milliseconds, right ?
-----Original Message-----
From: Christophe Benejean [mailto:chr...@u4...]=20
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 6:27 PM
To: Gayraud, Richard
Cc: Jacques, Olivier (OCBU-Test Infra); =
sip...@li...
Subject: RE: [Sipp-users] 200 Reply after INVITE request...
=09
=09
In fact, I reboot the machine, and it seems to work with a 40 seconds =
delay.
=20
The OS is linux red hat 7.3 for the uac and 9 for uas.
=20
Thanks, Richard, for your help...
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: Gayraud, Richard [mailto:ric...@hp...]=20
Sent: vendredi 23 avril 2004 18:22
To: Christophe Benejean=20
Cc: Jacques, Olivier (OCBU-Test Infra); =
sip...@li...
Subject: RE: [Sipp-users] 200 Reply after INVITE request...
=20
This is very strange... I mean, if delay < 1/2 sec, then messages
get disordered (and always in the same way ?). Did you had a look in=20
debug mode (make debug) with sipp step by step to understand what =
happened
in the tool or if this is due to the OS ?
=20
Which OS by the way ?
=20
Richard.
-----Original Message-----
From: Christophe Benejean [mailto:chr...@u4...]=20
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 5:28 PM
To: Gayraud, Richard
Cc: Jacques, Olivier (OCBU-Test Infra)
Subject: RE: [Sipp-users] 200 Reply after INVITE request...
It works better with 500 ms delay...=20
=20
Thanks richard.
=20
=20
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: Gayraud, Richard [mailto:ric...@hp...]=20
Sent: vendredi 23 avril 2004 17:18
To: Christophe Benejean=20
Cc: Jacques, Olivier (OCBU-Test Infra)
Subject: RE: [Sipp-users] 200 Reply after INVITE request...
=20
Really ? Even if you put long delays like 2000 ms or more ?
=20
How much simultaneous sessions do you have ? How do you trace what's =
happening
on the network ? Local network ? No router ???
=20
Rich/
-----Original Message-----
From: Christophe Benejean [mailto:chr...@u4...]=20
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 5:14 PM
To: Gayraud, Richard; Jacques, Olivier (OCBU-Test Infra); =
sip...@li...
Subject: RE: [Sipp-users] 200 Reply after INVITE request...
It doesn't change the result... First the OK message and trying, =
ringing sent after.
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: Gayraud, Richard [mailto:ric...@hp...]=20
Sent: vendredi 23 avril 2004 10:30
To: Christophe Benejean ; Jacques, Olivier (OCBU-Test Infra); =
sip...@li...
Subject: RE: [Sipp-users] 200 Reply after INVITE request...
=20
Try adding some "pause" instructions between your 100, 180, and 200 =
packets
in the server scenario:=20
=20
<pause milliseconds=3D"20">
=20
As they are all sent at the same time in your sever scenario, I would =
not
get surprised if they are misorded by UDP.
=20
Richard.
-----Original Message-----
From: sip...@li... =
[mailto:sip...@li...] On Behalf Of Christophe =
Benejean=20
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 8:32 AM
To: Jacques, Olivier (OCBU-Test Infra); =
sip...@li...
Subject: RE: [Sipp-users] 200 Reply after INVITE request...
Morning Olivier,
=20
I rebooted my machine, but I've got same problem... I send you my =
uac and uas xml files, you can maybe sort out something wrong.
=20
Thanks,
=20
Christophe
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: JACQUES,OLIVIER (HP-France,ex1) =
[mailto:oli...@hp...]=20
Sent: jeudi 22 avril 2004 17:37
To: sip...@li...
Cc: Christophe Benejean
Subject: RE: [Sipp-users] 200 Reply after INVITE request...
=20
Christophe,
=20
Ok, I got both files.
But I cannot explain this behaviour. There is no such thing as =
automatic/default answers in sipp (it's a test tool, not a SIP network =
element). So sipp strictly act the way you specified in your XML =
scenario.
Can you make sure that you don't have another sipp instance running =
on the same machine?
Also, I noticed that you are building the record-route using =
[remote_ip] and [remote_port] fields. To have them filled in, please =
specify the remote IP address and port on the command line of sipp (they =
are empty in the ethereal trace you sent).
=20
Olivier.
=20
=09
_____ =20
From: Christophe Benejean [mailto:chr...@u4...] =
Sent: jeudi 22 avril 2004 16:17
To: 'JACQUES,OLIVIER (HP-France,ex1)'; =
sip...@li...
Subject: RE: [Sipp-users] 200 Reply after INVITE request...
Curious...
=20
And now ?
=20
I send you the ethereal dump too...
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: JACQUES,OLIVIER (HP-France,ex1) =
[mailto:oli...@hp...]=20
Sent: jeudi 22 avril 2004 15:57
To: sip...@li...
Cc: Christophe Benejean
Subject: RE: [Sipp-users] 200 Reply after INVITE request...
=20
Christophe,
=20
the file you sent is empty... I'm missing sipp_indexhtml.html !
=20
Olivier.
=20
=09
_____ =20
From: Christophe Benejean [mailto:chr...@u4...] =
Sent: jeudi 22 avril 2004 15:14
To: 'JACQUES,OLIVIER (HP-France,ex1)'; =
sip...@li...
Subject: RE: [Sipp-users] 200 Reply after INVITE request...
Hello Olivier,
=20
Thank you for your quick answer.
=20
I'm sorry... I sent you a wrong file. I test it with 180 Ringing =
instead, and I have the same problem...
=20
I attached an html document created with the very good tool =
sip-scenario that transforms Ethereal capture in HTML... This file shows =
you the unexpected behavior. My SIP proxy has 192.168.22.160 IP address, =
uac 10.0.2.3 and uas 10.0.1.4.
=20
My SIP proxy is vovida vocal.
=20
Regards,
=20
Christophe
=20
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: JACQUES,OLIVIER (HP-France,ex1) =
[mailto:oli...@hp...]=20
Sent: jeudi 22 avril 2004 14:37
To: sip...@li...
Cc: Christophe Benejean
Subject: RE: [Sipp-users] 200 Reply after INVITE request...
=20
Hello Christophe,
=20
I tested your scenario in front of another sipp with the embedded =
uac scenario. sipp reacts as expected.
The problem seems to be in your scenario: the first message being:
SIP/2.0 180 Trying
Where it should be
SIP/2.0 100 Trying
=20
If you look at the following ethereal traces, it also looks good: =
we can see the TRYING, RINGING and then OK:
No. Time Source Destination =
Protocol Info
1 0.000000 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 =
SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:service@127.0.0.1:5060, with session =
description
2 0.000135 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 SIP =
Status: 180 Trying
3 0.000179 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 SIP =
Status: 180 Ringing
4 0.000216 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 =
SIP/SDP Status: 200 OK, with session description
5 0.000253 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 SIP =
Request: ACK sip:service@127.0.0.1:5060
6 0.000283 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 SIP =
Request: BYE sip:service@127.0.0.1:5060
7 0.000319 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 SIP =
Status: 200 OK
I can't explain the behavior you are seing. Can you check with an =
IP analyzer to really see what's going on in your case?
=20
Hope this helps,
Olivier.
=20
=20
=09
_____ =20
From: sip...@li... =
[mailto:sip...@li...] On Behalf Of Christophe =
Benejean=20
Sent: jeudi 22 avril 2004 10:55
To: sip...@li...
Subject: [Sipp-users] 200 Reply after INVITE request...
Hi all,
=20
I created an xml file (in the attached document), where I wait for =
an INVITE request, hence sipp run in server mode. On receiving this =
INVITE message, the uas has to send TRYING and RINGING and after OK =
messages in my xml scenario.
=20
But the problem is that the uas send OK reply directly after the =
INVITE request... and after continue running the scenario, i.e. sending =
TRYING, RINGING and OK...
=20
Is a normal behavior of sipp? In this case, How can we disable this =
auto-reply mechanism?=20
=20
Thanks for your answer...
=20
Christophe.
=20
Christophe B=E9n=E9jean
U4EA Technologies
*+33 4 92 94 47 39=20
=20
|