Menu
▾
▴
[Sipp-users] Fwd: Re: Support for multiple call-ids within a single scenario
|
From: Vui V. <vui...@ya...> - 2008-04-25 21:10:30
|
Forgot to include sipp-users... Thanks, Vui Vui Vui <vui...@ya...> wrote: Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:12:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Vui Vui <vui...@ya...> Subject: Re: [Sipp-users] Support for multiple call-ids within a single scenario To: Charles P Wright <cpw...@us...> Hi Charles, II'm also trying to look for a solution for this multiple call-ids in the same scenario issue. I'm kind of new to SIPp and I'm not quite clear about your suggestion, please forgive me if I'm asking questions which other people might have asked already. I'm currently trying to test SIP TLS with SIPp and I've already got the following scenarios to work: sipp uac ----(tls)---- sipp uas sipp register ---- (tls) ---- sip proxy sipp uac ----(tls)---- sip proxy ----(udp) sipp uas However, I'm having a problem with the scenario below: sipp uac----(tls)----sip proxy----(tls)----sipp uas The scenario failed at the point when the sip proxy tried to forward the INVITE to sipp uas, it initiated the handshake process with sipp uas and although I didn't see any error, the sip proxy just replied sipp uac with error 408 and did not forward the INVITE. Please see my wireshark capture, topology, uac xml, uas xml and trace logs here http://www.aic-cia.net/nhiepanh/sipp_tls.zip). Please also note that prior to running the uas scenario on endpoint2, I ran the register (TLS) scenario to register endpoint2 with my sip proxy and there was no problem there so all the keys & certificates are ok. I'm thinking since the TLS registration scenario works, if I can somehow combine the register & invite in the same uas scenario, the registration will establish the TLS connection between uas and the sip proxy. When the INVITE comes, my sip proxy won't have to initiate the handshake with my uas and then I might get this solution to work My questions to you are: 1. Will the prefix///call-id solution work for my above scenario? 2. If not, what do you mean by extending SIPp? Thanks, Vui Charles P Wright <cpw...@us...> wrote: If you can generate the call-IDs yourself, then you can do something of the format: prefix///call-id and prefix1///call-id and SIPp will treat them as the same scenario. Otherwise, you would need to extend SIPp. Charles "Philip Campion" Sent by: sip...@li... 04/25/2008 08:47 AM To cc Subject [Sipp-users] Support for multiple call-ids within a single scenario Hi, My team is using a SIPp process to generate single call tests. At this point we're less interested in the traffic capabilities of SIPp, but we do need ways to generate more complex call models. While 3PCC is one way to add complexity, we really need to support multiple call-id's within a single scenario, to simulate events like call waiting. We were wondering if anyone can suggest how this can be done. Many thanks, Philip ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Sipp-users mailing list Sip...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Sipp-users mailing list Sip...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users --------------------------------- Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. --------------------------------- Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. |