From: Joschka B. <jbo...@un...> - 2007-06-18 12:40:53
|
Hi, On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 22:06 +1000, Oliver Obst wrote: > On 18/06/2007, at 8:42 PM, Joschka Boedecker wrote: > > >>> To be more consistent, we may avoid using left and right for the > >>> flags > >>> altogether. For example, we may call: our flags and opponent > >>> flags! And we > >>> may use left and right instead of 1 and 2 which are used > >>> currently. So, we > >>> will have "our left flag(FLO), our right flag (FRO),..."!! (This > >>> is an > >>> example only). > >>> > >> > >> Good idea! This is what exactly my mean ;-) > >> This is useful while teams design strategy and formation, I think. > >> > >> Joschka, will we use the new flag names? > > > > I think it's a good idea. But we should choose different names from > > "our" and "opponent" (both start with 'O' ;-) ). How about "my > > team" (M) > > and "opponent team" (0). So it would look like: > > I'm not sure if I missed something, but as far as I understood the > discussion so far, I don't agree it's a good idea. > > The flag names (with "left" and "right" for flags on the left/right > side of the field) should be equally perceived by agents of both teams. > This is consistent with that real robots on the field see the same > flag on the field in equal colors. True. > If you label the flags with "my" / "opponent", this is a _semantic_ > annotation of the flag that can't be found on the soccer field. The > vision perceptor should only deliver the syntactic label of the flag, > and the intelligence of deciding which side the flags belong to > should be in the agent, not in the simulator. Wasn't there something like flipping the labels in the old simulator? Maybe I'm completely wrong though, I didn't check... > So IMHO, flipping the labels should be removed from the perceptor, > and using "left" for the left flags of teams of either side isn't any > better than the original labels. OK, so we leave the old labels and remove the flipping? Cheers, Joschka |