Re: [simspark-devel] Plan!

[Sander v. D. <sgv...@gm...>]

Hey guys,

I think this structure sounds good too. How shall we go ahead? It will
probably be best if one builds and fills the structure in the SVN
repository, it's probably not that much work that it makes sense to divide
over multiple people, right? The changes in the simspark CVS have already
been ported to the rcsoccersim repository, or not? If not, I think that's
the next step after moving to SVN.

Then I think we probably should look at basic bugs/code clean
up/documentation etc. until proposals for the 3DD league are in, so we don't
take on big changes that may overlap or interfere with work of the 3DD
teams.

Sander

On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah <hed...@ai...>wrote:

>  Hi,
> OK, it seems that we are agree with most of the suggestions. I think the
> migration process can be started now, with ZigoratAssistant and spark/ since
> they don't depend on anything else and everybody seems to agree with the
> proposed structure for them.
>
> Good luck,
> Hedayat
>
> *Mahdi <zig...@gm...> <zig...@gm...>* wrote on ۰۸/۱۱/۱۶
> 01:48:12:
>
> Hi Hedayat and all
>
>   I think it's better if rsgedit is not moved anywhere and be a package
> itself. Since rsgedit is not used commonly among RoboCup researchers. The
> sole use of rsgedit is for developers and people who intend to run their own
> simulations.
>
>   In case that every top-level directory is an independent package (which I
> did not know it beforehand!), I agree with most of the things spoken till
> now. 5 packages seems to be fair: spark, rcssserver3d, rsgedit,
> simspark-utilities, ZigoratAssistant plus a package which contains all of
> the above. (Just like previous versions of 2D simulator - rcsoccersim)
>
>   Current version of the ZigoratAssistant does not rely on any part of
> simulator or spark code. It's completely standalone (The only packages
> needed is of course ogre and it's related ones!). So it may be as you said.
> But I thought it would be better if it is placed beside the simulator
> packages, since all tools and packages needed (mandatory or optionally)
> would be all together. The primary good point for this idea is that
> everything would be found easily and all their wiki's and user faq's would
> be reachable in one place.
>
> Cheers
> Mahdi
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Simspark Generic Physical MAS Simulator
> simspark-devel mailing list
> sim...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simspark-devel
>
>