Re: [Simpleweb-Support] Non Executor-based Asynchronous Service

[Luis A. <lan...@gm...>]

Thanks everyone for your responses, but perhaps I wasn't very clear in my
original message. I am simply trying to implement a Container that does not
create a new thread for every request that requires an asynchronous
response. In the Asynchronous services example I quoted in the original
post, a java.util.concurrent.Executor is used, and that does create a new
thread for each request. I can't see an obvious way to use a single
separate thread and NIO in this case.


On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Brad McEvoy <br...@mc...>
wrote:

>
> On 12/06/14 14:06, Niall Gallagher wrote:
> > I have also implemented WebSockets for Simple, ill release it within a
> few months when I get some time.
> That would be cool :)
>
> Simple is integrated into milton.io (webdav server framework) and while
> most people use milton with servlets there are always some using the
> simple integration, particularly for embedded webdav servers.
>
> And push notifications are coming to webdav where websockets will be the
> main transport mechanism.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions
> Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems
> Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data.
> Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems
> _______________________________________________
> Simpleweb-Support mailing list
> Sim...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simpleweb-support
>