From: Gilson S. <g.s...@da...> - 2002-09-17 12:58:36
|
I didn't heard any reference about SNMP via TCP protocol. My RH (lsof -i:161) or Win2k (netstat -an|find "161") never shows a daemon listening on TCP port 161. Opening (or allowing) port 161/162 for TCP protocol is unnecessary. -Gilson At 9/15/2002 03:33 PM, you wrote: >>ACCEPT loc net udp snmp >>ACCEPT loc net tcp snmp >>ACCEPT net loc udp snmp >>ACCEPT net loc tcp snmp >DNAT net loc:192.168.0.3 udp snmp >DNAT net loc:192.168.0.3 tcp snmp |