|
From: Paul G. <pa...@ge...> - 2005-01-06 23:08:43
|
Tom Eastep wrote: > ... >>>>Could I humbly suggest using "=" as the separator? I think a rule >>>>like >>>>... > Given the current syntax, there are cases where we need to know where > the END of the address or address-list is. How about if we require IPV6 > addresses appearing in ":"-separated constructs to be enclosed in [..] > or <..>? > > ACCEPT loc:<::ffff:206.124.146.177> net tcp 25 In light of discussions like this, it seems to me like in the long term it would be more suitable to change the : separator. It's only going to gain in significance once IPv6 gains prevalence. -- Paul <http://paulgear.webhop.net> -- Did you know? Most email-borne viruses use a false sender address. Therefore you cannot track down the sender using that address. Instead, keep your virus scanning software up-to-date and just delete any suspicious emails you receive. |