Re: [Shorewall-devel] Shorewall and IPV6

[Tom E. <te...@sh...>]

On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 14:45 -0200, Eduardo Ferreira wrote:
> 
> Tom wrote on 06/01/2005 14:31:06:
> 
> > On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 07:58 -0800, Tom Eastep wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 19:11 +1000, Paul Gear wrote:
> > > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > I shouldn't try to do design before my first morning coffee. Using
> "/"
> > is awkward because it appears in CIDR notation. But another
> separator,
> > such as ";" would work.
> > 
> > -Tom
> Could I humbly suggest using "=" as the separator? I think a rule
> like 
> 
> ACCEPT        loc=192.168.0.1 net tcp 3133 
> 
> is better to read then 
> 
> ACCEPT        loc;192.168.0.1 net tcp 3133 
> 
> is it not? 

Actually, I prefer ";". In Shorewall, "=" has its usual Shell meaning
(assignment).

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep    \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline,     \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ te...@sh...
PGP Public Key   \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key