From: Alexandre B. <abo...@st...> - 2012-07-26 17:50:35
|
Hi Frederique, There is a bug in that version when creating indicator variables. Note that I do not anymore support that version of sgems. I have been working on a new version with new visualization and added functionalities. These include the indicator transform but also categorical variables such as post-processing of categories (as you mentionned in your previous emails). That version is in advanced stage, I am currently using it in short course and would be available soon. If you want to help in the development, send me an email at abo...@ar... and I will send you a version in return of feedbacks. In your current situation you will have to write a small python script to transform the data into indicators. Best, Alex. p.s. I would suggest you to subscribe on the linkedin sgems group to get the latest news. On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:26 AM, FOURNIER Frederique < fre...@be...> wrote: > Does someone have elements for helping me on the problem I mentioned > below, with post processing of categorical variable simulations, and > necessary indicator transformations of the simulations preliminary to the > post-processing?**** > > ** ** > > Thank you for your help,**** > > ** ** > > Frédérique**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *De :* FOURNIER Frederique > *Envoyé :* mardi 24 juillet 2012 11:22 > *À :* sge...@li... > *Cc :* FOURNIER Frederique > *Objet :* Indicator coding for categorical variable transformation**** > > ** ** > > Dear All,**** > > ** ** > > I have loaded in SGEMS a series of lithofacies realizations which I built > with plurigaussian approach with another software, each realization being a > volume of lithofacies coded from 11 to 19 (9 different lithofacies).**** > > ** ** > > I want to use the simulation post-processing facilities of SGEMS. It does > not seem to be fit for categorical variable? Is that correct?**** > > Consequently, I decided to transform each lithofacies realization into a > series of 9 indicator volumes (since I have 9 categories) to run the > post-processing on the indicator volumes, instead running it directly on > the lithofacies volumes.**** > > ** ** > > But I cannot manage with the menu “properties/Create Indicator/user > defined” to compute the indicator associated to the values of the > categorical variable. When I enter the values “12 13 14…” there is an error > message telling the thresholds are not appropriate.**** > > ** ** > > Could you help me? Is there another way to post-process realizations of a > categorical variable, than creating associated indicators?**** > > ** ** > > Thank you very much,**** > > ** ** > > Frédérique**** > > ** ** > > *Dr Frédérique FOURNIER***** > > E&P Consultancy**** > > *Beicip-Franlab***** > > 232, Avenue Napoléon Bonaparte**** > > F-92500 Rueil-Malmaison France**** > > *E-mail: **fre...@be...*<fre...@be...> > **** > > *Phone: +33 (0)1 47 08 82 29***** > > *Fax: +33 (0)1 47 08 81 08***** > > ** ** > > -- > This message and any attachments (the message) are confidential and > intended solely for the addressees. > Any unauthorised use, dissemination or reproduction is strictly prohibited. > The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the > contents of this message arising as a result of e-mail transmission. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Sgems-users mailing list > Sge...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sgems-users > > |