Re: [seq24-users] seq24

[Ivan H. <ihe...@ki...>]

Maybe not "transfer" but we should investigate sourceforge's svn server 
to share developenment among let's say four or five developers so each 
one can merge patches of their own or submitted by users and chose when 
code is ready for release.
It should not be as hard as it seems and will avoid forking on a project 
that is great but still needs a lot of work son several areas.

I will read a little, reactivate my old sourceforge account and try to 
setup an svn just to see how good it goes.

Ivan

Eric Boon wrote:
> Wouldn't it b easier to transfer ownership of the project to someone  
> who is willing to take it on?
> I mean, there's no need to create a fork and have a 'side' project...
>
>   Just my 2 eurocents,
>      Eric
>
> On May 7, 2008, at 12:52 PM, Rob Buse wrote:
>
>   
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I apologize for not writing the lists sooner.
>>
>> I hate to say it, and most have probably guessed, but my development
>> efforts have moved away from seq24.  I just don't have the time for it
>> anymore.  These days it seems hard to find time to even use seq24, let
>> alone add features to it.
>>
>> Some have suggested maybe forking the project and taking it in a new
>> direction, I think it would be excellent if seq24 could continue to  
>> grow.
>>
>> cheers,
>> Rob
>>
>>
>>