[seq24-users] gtkmm-2.4?

[karlos <k.g...@gm...>]

Hi,

I have justr tried to compile seq24 on gentoo 2.6.12-r6 with gtkmm-2.4
with no success. I tried to emerge an earlier version  on gtkmm, but
run into a dependancy error. Here is a little snapshop of the error I
get from seq24:

event.cpp: In member function `void event::print()':
event.cpp:233: warning: unsigned int format, long int arg (arg 3)
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.     -g -O2 -DXTHREADS -D_REENTRANT
-DXUSE_MTSAFE_API -I/usr/include/gtkmm-2.4
-I/usr/lib/gtkmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/glibmm-2.4
-I/usr/lib/glibmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/gdkmm-2.4
-I/usr/lib/gdkmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/pangomm-1.4
-I/usr/include/atkmm-1.6 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0
-I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
-I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pango-1.0
-I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/freetype2/config
-I/usr/include/atk-1.0     -Wall -MT seqdata.o -MD -MP -MF
".deps/seqdata.Tpo" -c -o seqdata.o seqdata.cpp; \
then mv -f ".deps/seqdata.Tpo" ".deps/seqdata.Po"; else rm -f
".deps/seqdata.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
seqdata.cpp: In member function `virtual void seqdata::on_realize()':
seqdata.cpp:106: error: use of class template `template<class T_return, cla=
ss
   T_arg1, class T_arg2, class T_arg3, class T_arg4, class T_arg5, class
   T_arg6, class T_arg7> class sigc::slot' as expression
seqdata.cpp: In member function `void seqdata::on_size_allocate(GtkAllocati=
on*)
   ':
seqdata.cpp:532: error: no matching function for call to `seqdata::
   on_size_allocate(GtkAllocation*&)'
/usr/include/gtkmm-2.4/gtkmm/widget.h:341: error: candidates are: virtual v=
oid
   Gtk::Widget::on_size_allocate(Gtk::Allocation&)
make[2]: *** [seqdata.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/karlos/dnl/seq24-0.6.3/src'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/karlos/dnl/seq24-0.6.3/src'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1

I tried it just by making a soft-link from gtkmm-2.4 to gtkmm-2.0 :)
Guess thats not really a good way to do it, was worth a try though. Is
there any plan to update the dependancy yet, or do I have to sort out
the older version?

thanks,

KArstne