Re: [Semanticscuttle-devel] SemanticScuttle 0.98.0 is near

[Mark P. <mpe...@gm...>]

Is there something I can help with?
On May 11, 2011 1:33 PM, "Christian Weiske" <cw...@cw...> wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
>
>> > I assume that getWatchNames uses the current user. Can't you just
>> > set the current user without storing that information in the
>> > session?
>> The call to getBookmarks() makes calls to getCurrentUserId() and
>> isLoggedIn() which both require data stored in the session
>> (via setCurrentUserId()). So if you want to avoid storing data in the
>> session then we may need to add an additional argument to
>> getBookmarks(). The getWatchNames() has two arguments (user ID,
>> Watched By), so it makes no reference to the session/current user
>> data.
>>
>> Throwing this out as an idea, I could pass the privatekey as an
>> argument in getBookmarks() which will eliminate the need to store any
>> data in the session. Thoughts?
>
> Nope, in that case we need to fix the user storage to not depend on the
> session. I'll fix that.
>
>
> --
> Regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen
> Christian Weiske
>
> -=≡ Geeking around in the name of science since 1982 ≡=-