Re: [Semanticscuttle-devel] SemanticScuttle 0.98.0 is near

[Mark P. <mpe...@gm...>]

Ok.

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Christian Weiske <cw...@cw...>wrote:

> Hello Mark,
>
>
> > > I assume that getWatchNames uses the current user. Can't you just
> > > set the current user without storing that information in the
> > > session?
> > The call to getBookmarks() makes calls to getCurrentUserId() and
> > isLoggedIn() which both require data stored in the session
> > (via setCurrentUserId()).  So if you want to avoid storing data in the
> > session then we may need to add an additional argument to
> > getBookmarks(). The getWatchNames() has two arguments (user ID,
> > Watched By), so it makes no reference to the session/current user
> > data.
> >
> > Throwing this out as an idea, I could pass the privatekey as an
> > argument in getBookmarks() which will eliminate the need to store any
> > data in the session.  Thoughts?
>
> Nope, in that case we need to fix the user storage to not depend on the
> session. I'll fix that.
>
>
> --
> Regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen
> Christian Weiske
>
> -=≡ Geeking around in the name of science since 1982 ≡=-
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
> What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
> Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
> to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
> _______________________________________________
> Semanticscuttle-devel mailing list
> Sem...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semanticscuttle-devel
>
>