Re: [Semanticscuttle-devel] SemanticScuttle 0.98.0 is near

[Christian W. <cw...@cw...>]

Hello Mark,


> > I assume that getWatchNames uses the current user. Can't you just
> > set the current user without storing that information in the
> > session?
> The call to getBookmarks() makes calls to getCurrentUserId() and
> isLoggedIn() which both require data stored in the session
> (via setCurrentUserId()).  So if you want to avoid storing data in the
> session then we may need to add an additional argument to
> getBookmarks(). The getWatchNames() has two arguments (user ID,
> Watched By), so it makes no reference to the session/current user
> data.
> 
> Throwing this out as an idea, I could pass the privatekey as an
> argument in getBookmarks() which will eliminate the need to store any
> data in the session.  Thoughts?

Nope, in that case we need to fix the user storage to not depend on the
session. I'll fix that.


-- 
Regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Christian Weiske

-=≡ Geeking around in the name of science since 1982 ≡=-