Re: [sdcc-devel] Re : Possible Array bug <foo[foo[5]+2]=10>

[Johan K. <joh...@id...>]

> The fix looks good, it generates a redundant move, but the
> generated code looks good to me.... do you see anything wrong with
> it ?

It looks nice. However the new peephole 223 (which had a typo) is an exact
copy of 221b that didn't work either because bindVar() swallowed the
trailing ')'. I fixed that in SDCCpeeph.c:bindVar(). Also removed 222 and
223.

Johan