Re: [sdcc-devel] Having __far pointers that are wider than generic pointers?

[Maarten B. <sou...@ds...>]

Philipp Klaus Krause wrote on 2025-01-10 15:09:
> Am 10.01.25 um 12:01 schrieb Maarten Brock:
>> I believe generic pointers should be able to hold function pointers.
>> And I assume that this means that generic pointers can also hold far
>> pointers. And thus the mcs51-like approach is required.
> 
> Generic pointers already can't hold function pointers for the stm8 
> large
> memory model.

Doesn't the standard say that any pointer (including a function pointer)
when cast to (void*) and then cast back to its original type should 
result
in the same valid (function) pointer ?

Maarten